08.12.2012 Views

CSR and Competitiveness European SMEs - KMU Forschung Austria

CSR and Competitiveness European SMEs - KMU Forschung Austria

CSR and Competitiveness European SMEs - KMU Forschung Austria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CSR</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Competitiveness</strong> - <strong>European</strong> <strong>SMEs</strong>’ Good Practice - Consolidated <strong>European</strong> Report 35<br />

Regarding the level of engagement in <strong>CSR</strong> activities different ‘types’ of <strong>SMEs</strong> can be<br />

identified (Business in the Community, 2002):<br />

• <strong>SMEs</strong> that are purely motivated by financial gain <strong>and</strong> do not see any relevance for<br />

social engagement. They believe that they do not have any social responsibilities<br />

outside the narrow confines of their business <strong>and</strong> are not active members of business<br />

networks.<br />

• <strong>SMEs</strong> that have relatively minimal experience in the engagement with social<br />

responsibility activities, but that may have participated in e.g. a volunteering project.<br />

Their motivations tend to be issue-based.<br />

• Entrepreneurs that work very independently <strong>and</strong> in isolation from others. Their socially<br />

responsible activities are often fragmented. They are less interested in engaging with<br />

others, so they are difficult to reach <strong>and</strong> support.<br />

• Smart pragmatists who recognise the business benefits of acting responsibly.<br />

• Enlightened pragmatists who are motivated by broader, long-term societal goals as well<br />

as underst<strong>and</strong>ing the basic business case.<br />

• At last, <strong>SMEs</strong> which have started as social enterprises in which the owners/managers<br />

are motivated heavily by a desire to create positive community or social impact. They<br />

are more likely to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>CSR</strong> concepts <strong>and</strong> terms <strong>and</strong> seek more opportunities for<br />

engagement.<br />

Also the Spanish Foretica Report (2006) establishes a typology of enterprises according to their<br />

degree of involvement in <strong>CSR</strong> activities <strong>and</strong> attitudes:<br />

• “Leader” companies (about 4 %) believe in <strong>and</strong> apply the idea of <strong>CSR</strong>.<br />

• “Me too” enterprises (about 11 %) do not fully believe in <strong>CSR</strong>, but are engaged to a<br />

certain degree.<br />

• In the category of “falling behind” more than 40 % of the enterprises are classified. They<br />

generally believe in <strong>CSR</strong> but do not apply it.<br />

• About one quarter of the enterprises are “indifferent”, i.e. are sceptical about <strong>CSR</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

do not apply it.<br />

• “Detractors” (16.5 %) do neither believe in nor apply the <strong>CSR</strong> philosophy <strong>and</strong> consider<br />

that it is not useful at all.<br />

• The last category is called “inconsistent/contradictory”. Those about 4 % are sceptical<br />

on <strong>CSR</strong> but believe in its usefulness.<br />

5.4 Characteristics of <strong>SMEs</strong>’ <strong>CSR</strong> activities<br />

Like many business decisions in <strong>SMEs</strong>, particularly micro <strong>and</strong> small enterprises, also <strong>CSR</strong><br />

activities of this company group are of a rather informal character. There rarely is appointed a<br />

specific person or group of persons responsible for <strong>CSR</strong>. Rather, decisions with regard to<br />

<strong>CSR</strong> are mainly seen as a task for the owner/general managers, often under the involvement of<br />

employees (or a group thereof).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!