23.12.2016 Views

1701 RF final

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PADDOCK NEWS<br />

Brought<br />

to you by<br />

WORLD SUPERBIKE TRIES TO ADD EXCITEMENT<br />

BY MANIPULATING THE GRID FOR RACE 2<br />

The Superbike Commission, governing body for the World Superbike Championship, met in Madrid to<br />

introduce a number of changes to the rules for the World Superbike and World Supersport series for 2017.<br />

There were some minor changes to the sporting<br />

regulations, as well as a couple of tweaks to the<br />

technical regulations. But there were also two<br />

major changes which will have a significant impact<br />

for next season and beyond.<br />

The biggest change is also the most surprising and<br />

the least comprehensible. There is to be a major<br />

shake up in the way the grid for the second World<br />

Superbike race is set.<br />

The Superpole session run on Saturday morning<br />

will continue to set the grid for Race 1. The grid for<br />

Race 2, however, will be partially set by the results<br />

of Race 1, using a slightly complex formula.<br />

The first three rows of the grid for Race 2 will be<br />

filled by the riders who finished in 1st through<br />

9th place in Race 1. They will not, however,<br />

line up in their finishing order. The riders who<br />

finished in 4th, 5th, and 6th in Race 1 will start<br />

Race 2 from 1st, 2nd, and 3rd on the grid. The<br />

riders who finished in 7th, 8th, and 9th will start<br />

from 4th, 5th, and 6th.<br />

The riders who finished on the podium,<br />

however, will line up on the third row of the grid<br />

in reverse order. This means that the winner will<br />

line up in 9th, the rider who finished 2nd will<br />

start in 8th, and the rider who finished in 3rd will<br />

start the race from 7th on the grid.<br />

The grid from 10th place onwards will be set<br />

based on Superpole results. That does not<br />

necessarily mean that the starting positions<br />

10 through 22 will be the same as in Race 1,<br />

however, as riders who started outside of the<br />

Top 9 places, but finished 9th or better will<br />

move up.<br />

Similarly, riders who qualified in the Top 9 but<br />

crashed out or finished outside the Top 9 will be<br />

reshuffled down to the fourth row or worse.<br />

All this makes calculating grid positions a<br />

little complicated for 10th place and beyond.<br />

Basically, the riders who did not finish in the Top<br />

9 in Race 1 will start Race 2 in order of their<br />

qualifying time.<br />

Of the remaining riders, the rider with the best<br />

qualifying position from Superpole will start from<br />

10th, the second best qualifying position will<br />

start from 11th, etc.<br />

The most controversial change is obviously the<br />

change to the Top 9, however. In what appears<br />

to be an attempt to make the racing a little more<br />

exciting, success in Race 1 is to be punished,<br />

with the podium finishers being put back to the<br />

third row of the grid.<br />

The idea, presumably, is that the best riders<br />

from Race 1 will have to make their way through<br />

traffic, providing some excitement and making it<br />

more difficult for a rider who dominates Race 1<br />

to do the same in Race 2.<br />

This would appear to be a misguided idea for<br />

several reasons: firstly, the essence of World<br />

Championship motorcycle racing is to find the<br />

rider and machine combination that performs<br />

best in each race.<br />

Adding additional, complex obstacles to one<br />

group while not applying the same to another<br />

would appear to violate the sporting ethos of a<br />

World Championship series. That risks alienating<br />

the hardcore World Superbike fans that are the<br />

backbone of the sport.<br />

Secondly, making the way the grid is set so<br />

complex risks making it difficult for casual fans<br />

to understand what is going on. Fans will find<br />

it hard to remember the process, and have<br />

difficulty explaining it to their friends.<br />

Though ultimately, grid positions are not<br />

the most important part of a race weekend,<br />

unnecessary complexity is more likely to make<br />

things worse rather than better.<br />

Finally, it is unlikely to make much difference.<br />

In 2016, Jonathan Rea, Tom Sykes, and Chaz<br />

Davies split the overwhelming majority of race<br />

wins among them.<br />

Rea and Davies both won races starting from<br />

6th position, while Sykes won starting from 4th,<br />

and finished 2nd starting from 5th. Rea, Sykes,<br />

and Davies were dominant throughout 2016,<br />

often finishing many seconds ahead of the rest<br />

of the field.<br />

Starting from 7th through 9th will slow them<br />

up only slightly, and is unlikely to reduce their<br />

chances of winning.<br />

Such a system is more likely to result in one<br />

rider dominating the second race. With the three<br />

best riders on the third row, the chances of<br />

them all hitting the front together is slim.<br />

It is more likely that one rider will get a break<br />

and get through quickly, while one or both of<br />

the others gets caught up briefly. If one of the<br />

fastest riders hits the front on his own, he is<br />

more likely to get a gap and get away.<br />

An intellectually more interesting question –<br />

but one which again highlights the weakness<br />

of the new system – is whether it places a<br />

premium on finishing 4th. The points differential<br />

between finishing 3rd and 4th in Race 1 is 3<br />

points (16 vs 13).<br />

The question riders who find themselves battling<br />

for 3rd in Race 1 will have to ask themselves<br />

is whether they will gain more points over their<br />

championship rivals in Race 2 by starting from<br />

pole than they would by taking the 3 extra<br />

points for 3rd and starting from 7th, two rows<br />

further back.<br />

Battles for 3rd place could devolve into the<br />

opposite, a battle for 4th with riders slowing<br />

down to try to force the others to overtake. That<br />

will not make the championship look very good.<br />

It is easy to guess why the Superbike<br />

Commission made such a change. With the<br />

popularity of the series languishing, they are<br />

trying to find a way to make it more attractive.<br />

They are caught between a rock and a hard<br />

place, however: they have already split up the<br />

two-race format over two days, and moved the<br />

races to start at 1pm local time.<br />

They have done this to avoid racing at the same<br />

time as Formula One, which they often clash with<br />

over the course of the season. The early races<br />

make it less attractive to attend each weekend,<br />

but more attractive for TV stations, who can<br />

show the World Superbike series without the fear<br />

of having to go against the ratings juggernaut<br />

which is Formula One.<br />

The question is, just how successful will this rule<br />

change be? The omens are not particularly good.<br />

The second major change to the rules is far<br />

less controversial. World Supersport races are<br />

now also to be run under the same flag-to-flag<br />

format as World Superbike. This requires a<br />

change in the technical rules, to allow parts to<br />

be replaced which will make wheel swaps faster.<br />

20 RIDEFAST MAGAZINE JANUARY 2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!