03.03.2017 Views

VIable

HLCCompendium

HLCCompendium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NDHI<br />

NAT IONAL DIALOGUE FOR<br />

Healthcare Innovation<br />

Reforming the Physician Self-<br />

Referral Law<br />

Organization Overview<br />

• Premier, Inc. is a healthcare performance improvement<br />

company that unites 3,750 hospitals and 130,000<br />

other providers<br />

• Mission Health System, a not-for-profit independent<br />

community hospital system, is the largest healthcare<br />

system in western North Carolina and the region’s<br />

only safety net health system<br />

• Mission Health cares for nearly 900,000 people<br />

across the state’s eighteen most western counties<br />

Background<br />

Because Premier serves, and is owned by, healthcare<br />

providers, the barriers to delivering coordinated care<br />

are top priorities for Premier. Mission Health System,<br />

a Premier member, is committed to implementing value-based<br />

payments to enhance care coordination for<br />

patients and improve the system’s financial stability.<br />

However, unclear legal boundaries in fraud and abuse<br />

laws are suppressing this transition, due to the legal<br />

ramifications associated with potential violations.<br />

Mission Health’s movement toward pay for performance<br />

has been limited by the Stark Law, which prohibits<br />

provider systems from linking physician payments to<br />

the volume or value of their referrals. This law hinders<br />

value-based payment contracts because it:<br />

• Prevents health systems from compensating<br />

employed physicians differentially, based on their<br />

contributions to improving outcomes<br />

––<br />

Instead, the Stark Law requires any incentive<br />

program to distribute payments equally to participating<br />

physicians, regardless of their level<br />

of effort, which discourages change<br />

––<br />

While there are exception waivers for programs<br />

like ACOs, the Stark Law prevents provider<br />

systems other than ACOs from making true<br />

progress across the organization<br />

• Prohibits health systems from offering incentives to<br />

affiliated, but independent physicians, who comprise<br />

the majority of the system’s physician network<br />

––<br />

When these physícans cannot be held<br />

accountable for outcomes because of the<br />

Stark Law, the system cannot shift to<br />

value-based care<br />

The Negative Impact of the Stark Law<br />

on Patient Care<br />

Geneticists can help expectant mothers who learn<br />

that their unborn children are carrying a fatal condition<br />

understand what to expect during the delivery.<br />

Mission Health geneticists strongly desire to<br />

have this conversation at the obstetrician’s office,<br />

in order to share this devastating information in a<br />

supportive, familiar environment. Geneticists would<br />

not charge the expectant parents or the physician’s<br />

practice for the service.<br />

However, it is possible that this service could be<br />

seen as providing “something of financial value” to<br />

the obstetrician’s practice. Because the Stark Law is<br />

a strict liability statute, which does not take program<br />

intent into account, Mission Health cannot provide<br />

this and other care-enhancing programs to patients.<br />

An Initiative of the<br />

103 |<br />

Reforming the Physician Self-Referral Law

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!