30.04.2017 Views

658349328743289

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 Part II: Realising That Character Is Everything<br />

almost nothing about Jenkins’s own inner life – even major events such as his<br />

wife’s miscarriage are only revealed in conversation with the other characters.<br />

This device enables the narrator to comment on and interpret events, while<br />

keeping the focus clearly on the other characters rather than himself.<br />

Write a story told by a narrator who heard about the main events from another<br />

person. Think about how the events may have become distorted in the telling.<br />

Begin the narrative, ‘Many years later, I was told what had really happened that<br />

day long ago when . . . ’<br />

Seeing everything with an omniscient narrator<br />

The omniscient (all-knowing) narrator is the traditional 19th-century style of<br />

writing a narrative. Fyodor Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov (1880) and<br />

Charles Dickens’s Our Mutual Friend (1865) are good examples. The author is<br />

the narrator and knows everything about all the characters: what they think<br />

and feel, what happened to them in the past, and what will happen to them<br />

in the future. This kind of narrative may be highly suitable for large historical<br />

epics, sagas and long novels with many characters, and it does offer the<br />

writer a huge amount of flexibility, but the problem is that it can seem too<br />

distant.<br />

The omniscient narrator as a disembodied being who looks down from above<br />

and controls everything is now rather outmoded in literature. Today, writers<br />

tend to avoid dealing in absolute truth, but instead prefer to accept that<br />

different people have different subjective views, and so they try to be more<br />

pluralistic in their approach.<br />

Many contemporary writers have found a way of personifying their omniscient<br />

narrators. In his 2005 novel The Book Thief, now also a film, Markus Zusak<br />

made death into a character in the novel – death, of course, is omniscient. In<br />

The Lovely Bones (2002), also filmed, Alice Sebold kills off her main character<br />

at the end of the first chapter – she’s then looking down from heaven and<br />

observing everything that happens to the other characters in the novel.<br />

If you’re writing an omniscient narrative, modern readers almost certainly need<br />

to know who that narrator is: perhaps a character in the future writing about<br />

what happened in the past, a self-conscious author writing the story, a history<br />

professor or a god-like or alien being. The identity doesn’t matter as long as<br />

you give some explanation as to why the narrator knows what he knows.<br />

Although the omniscient narrator can go into the heads of all the characters,<br />

in practice most narratives restrict this to only a few of the main characters.<br />

Readers have difficulty identifying closely with more than a handful of significant<br />

characters.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!