01.05.2017 Views

3658925934

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

likely it is to be imitated. 41 A new type of horsedrawn cart is not likely to be imitated by a society that<br />

has not yet invented the wheel, any more than by another which makes widespread use of automobiles<br />

and railroad trains. The “extra-logical” form of the same law—the more an invention meets the<br />

predominant cultural emphasis, the more likely it is to be imitated—calls attention to such<br />

nontechnological factors as the relative cultural emphasis on novelty as opposed to tradition. 42<br />

Attention to these two contrasting emphases—the logical or the extra-logical—resulted in two<br />

corresponding types of laws. Concern with the logical aspects of invention and imitation moved<br />

Tarde to distinguish inventions that could be used as substitutes for one another from those that could<br />

be accumulated without displacing others. When two substitutable inventions compete—contrasting<br />

linguistic expressions, or forms of dress—the result is a “logical duel”; when two complementary<br />

inventions are brought together, the result is “logical union”—for example, the wheel and the<br />

domesticated animal in the horsedrawn cart. But even logically opposed inventions will not be forced<br />

into overt opposition with one another unless observers in the society around them point out their<br />

incompatibility; in the absence of such criticism, relatively incompatible inventions may very well<br />

coexist for some time. Eventually, however, their presence tends to generate what Tarde referred to,<br />

in a discussion in many ways similar to more recent ones dealing with “cognitive dissonance,” 43 as<br />

one of two basic types of “logical strain.” The second source of strain is in the absolute advance of<br />

knowledge, which would lead to increasing numbers of logical unions. To explain the source of this<br />

strain, Tarde does not rely on what more culturally-oriented social scientists might have posited—the<br />

incomplete attainment of a basic value favoring the increase of knowledge. On the contrary, his<br />

preference for “inter-mental” explanation becomes apparent. Both types of strains originate in a<br />

common source: the intensive interaction of minds, which leads to rapid circulation of ideas and to<br />

greater consistency of thought as well as a tendency toward the expansion of knowledge. 44 Thus,<br />

stated in propositional form, the more frequent the interaction in a society, the greater the strain<br />

toward consistency of thought, and the more rapid the growth of knowledge.<br />

But Tarde recognized that such a formulation is too simple. Ignoring cultural variables at outset he<br />

introduced them later. Societies, as well as historical periods, vary, he pointed out, in the relative<br />

emphasis that they place on consistency as opposed to inventiveness. He even suggests a cyclical<br />

pattern according to which societies would alternate between an emphasis first on inventiveness and<br />

then on consistency; when large numbers of inventions are being created, consistency is difficult to<br />

maintain, but over time efforts toward rationalization become increasingly essential. The nineteenth<br />

century, he suggests, was a century of massive invention, and perhaps the twentieth century would<br />

have to be devoted to rationalizing the discoveries of the nineteenth. As far as social thought is<br />

concerned, there seems to have been more than a grain of truth in this prediction, at least for the first<br />

half of the twentieth century.<br />

Turning to the “extra-logical” laws of imitation, we find one general principle underlying much of<br />

Tarde’s discussion: initially inventions tend to be imitated by those parts of man and society that are<br />

closest to the source of invention, from which they subsequently radiate outward to more distant<br />

parts. 45 While not explicitly stated, this principle lies behind Tarde’s otherwise less than obvious law<br />

that imitations spread “from the inner to the outer man.” Nowhere is his general preference for<br />

intellectual over material causes more apparent than in the propositions deriving from this law. 46<br />

Tarde posits that ideas are communicated before their material expressions; religious dogmas are<br />

transmitted before the associated rites; ends are disseminated before the means to their attainment;<br />

general ideas are accepted before they receive juridical or legislative support. In this series of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!