appear considerably different than <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>jet</strong> shown in Figure 1. In this way, a variety <strong>of</strong> pulses can be included in one <strong>jet</strong>. For example, one pulse may create "<strong>water</strong> hammer" on <strong>the</strong> target surface, ano<strong>the</strong>r may clear out residual <strong>water</strong> and material with a "shaped change" leading edge and ano<strong>the</strong>r protect <strong>the</strong> entire stream from aerodynamic disruption. Time-Independent Combinations Experimental evidence shows <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> being able to "dial-in" <strong>jet</strong> performance features to create maximum target damage. The parameters can be searched by <strong>the</strong> operator at will, independent <strong>of</strong> any time frame. The range <strong>of</strong> Perc<strong>us</strong>sive Jet variables can be much greater than in <strong>the</strong> time-dependent combinations. This approach to <strong>jet</strong> cutting is especially beneficial when working with inhomogeneo<strong>us</strong> materials. SUMMARY 1. Being able to control frequency, amplitude and waveform in pulsed <strong>jet</strong>s is not only important but essential if <strong>the</strong> full potential <strong>of</strong> pulsed <strong>jet</strong>s is to be realized. 2, A variety <strong>of</strong> different pulses can be incorporated in a single <strong>jet</strong> in a time dependent or time-independent manner. REFERENCES 1. Nebeker, E.B. and Rodriguez, S.E., "Perc<strong>us</strong>sive Water Jets for Rock Cutting," Proc. Third International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1976, Paper BI, 9 pp. 2. Nebeker, E.B. and Rodriguez, S.E., "Perc<strong>us</strong>sive Water Jets for Rapid Excavation," 1973, Scientific Associates, Inc. 3. Nebeker, E.B. and Rodriguez, S.E., "Development <strong>of</strong> Perc<strong>us</strong>sive Water Jets," 1979, Scientific Associates, Inc. 4. Nebeker, E.B. and Rodriguez, S.E., "Pulsing Water Jets," Proc. Seventh International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1984. 5. Donnelly, R.J. and Glaberson, W., "Experiments on <strong>the</strong> Capillary Instability <strong>of</strong> a Liquid Jet," Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1966, A290. 6. Houlston, R. and Vickers, G W., "Surface Cleaning Using Water-Jet Cavitation and Droplet Erosion," Proc. Fourth International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering,~ 1978, Paper H1, 18 pp. 7. Nebeker, E.B., "Stand<strong>of</strong>f Distance Improvement Using Perc<strong>us</strong>sive Jets," Proc Second U.S Water Jet Conference, 1983, 10 pp 8. F. Nebeker, E.B., "Development and Test <strong>of</strong> LargeDiameter Perc<strong>us</strong>sive Jets," 1982, Scientific Associates, Inc. 9. Leach, S.J. and Walker, G.L., "Some Aspects <strong>of</strong> Rock Cutting by High Speed Water Jets," Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 1966, 10. Brunton, J.H., "Deformation <strong>of</strong> Solids by Impact <strong>of</strong> Liquids at High Speeds," Erosion and Cavitation, Amer. Soc. Testing Mats., ASTM STP 307, 1962. 11. Cooley, l'[.C., "Rock Breakage by Pulsed High Pressure Water Jets," Proc. First International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1972, Paper B7. 43
12. Ponchot, W.D., "Hydrodynamic Model <strong>of</strong> Correlation <strong>of</strong> Metal Removal Rates from Repetitive Drop Impact," Erosion and Cavitation, Amer. Soc. Testing Mats., ASTM STP 474, 1970. 13. Eisenberg, P., "Cavitation and Impact Erosion," Characterization and Determination <strong>of</strong> Erosion Resistance, Amer. Soc. Testing Mats., ASTM STP 474, 1970. 14. Jaeger, J.C. and Cook, N.G.X., "Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Rock Mechanics," Chapman and Hall Ltd. and Science Paperbacks, 1971 15. Bieniawski, Z.T., "Mechanism <strong>of</strong> Brittle Fracture <strong>of</strong> Rock," MEG 580, 1967, Council for Scientific and Ind<strong>us</strong>trial Research, Pretoria, South Africa. 16. Yanaida, K., "Flow Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Water Jets," Proc. Second International Symposium on Jet Cutting~Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1974, Paper A2, 14 pp. 17. Brook, N. and Summers, D.A., "The Penetration <strong>of</strong> Rock by High-Speed Water Jets," Int. Journal <strong>of</strong> Rock Mechanics & Mining Science, Vol. 6, 1969, pp. 249-259. 18. Lichtarowicz, A. and Nwachukwu, G., Proc. Fourth International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1978, Paper B2, 6 pp. 19. Erdmann-Jesnitzer, F. and Schikorr, H. Louis a.W., "Cleaning, Drilling and Cutting by Interrupted Jets," Proc. Fifth International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1980, Paper B1, 11 pp. 20. Kiyohaski, H., Kyo, M, and Tanaka, S., "Hot Dry Rock Drilling by Interrupted Water Jets," Proc. Seventh International SvmDosium on Jet Cutting~Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1984. 21. Mazurkiewicz, M., "The Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Possibility <strong>of</strong> Bunching with a High Pressure Water Jet," Proc. Second U. S. Water Jet Conference, l983, 8 pp. 22. Puchala, R.J. and Vijay, M.M., "Study <strong>of</strong> an Ultrasonically Generated Cavitating or Interrupted Jet: Aspects <strong>of</strong> Design," Proc. Seventh International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1984. 23. Hawrylewicz, B.M., Purkala, R.J., and Vijay, M.M., Generation <strong>of</strong> Pulsed or Cavitating' Jets by Electric Discharge in High Speed Continuo<strong>us</strong> Water Jets," Proc. Eighth InternationalSymposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1986. 24. Erdmann-Jesnitzer, F., Hassan, A.M., and Louis, H., "A Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oscillation's Effects on <strong>the</strong> Cleaning and Cutting Efficiency <strong>of</strong> High Speed Water Jet," Proc. Third International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1976, Paper C3, 15 pp. 25. Danel, F. and Guilloud, J.C., "A High Speed Concentrated Drop Stream Generator," Proc. Second International Symposium on Jet Cutting-Technology, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1974, Paper A3, 6 pp. 26. Wylie, E.B., "Pipeline Dynamics and <strong>the</strong> Pulsed Jet," Proc. First International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technolozv, BHRA Fluid Engineering, 1972, Paper A5, 12 pp. 27. Chahine, G.L., Conn, A.F., Johnson, V.E., and Frederick, G.S., "Cleaning and Cutting with Self-Resonating Pulsed Water Jets," Proc.Second U. S. Water Jet Conference, 1983, 12 pp. 44
- Page 1 and 2: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH U.S. WATE
- Page 3 and 4: FOREWORD The U.S. Water Jet Confere
- Page 5 and 6: FIELD APPLICATIONS- MINING Water Je
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 1. Abrasive-Waterjet Nozzle
- Page 9 and 10: N2 = ⋅ 2 d 2 j mav N = 3 N 4 Sett
- Page 11 and 12: • Although reasonable correlation
- Page 13 and 14: Effect of Traverse Speed Increasing
- Page 15 and 16: Table 3. Material removal rate and
- Page 17 and 18: Abrasive flow rate 7.5 g/s (maximum
- Page 19 and 20: where u is the traverse rate in mm/
- Page 21 and 22: Table 4 shows the results of additi
- Page 23 and 24: this technique. The technique is al
- Page 25 and 26: 12. Preece, C., editor, "Treatise o
- Page 27 and 28: experiment was carried out to exami
- Page 29 and 30: of changes in jet pressure, nozzle
- Page 31 and 32: D = 0.0911 P 1.42 n 1.37 V −0.39
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 8. Average Specific Energy V
- Page 35 and 36: with the density of the material, o
- Page 37 and 38: PERCUSSIVE JETS—STATE-OF-THE-ART
- Page 39 and 40: This process of discharge modulatio
- Page 41 and 42: has been demonstrated on all types
- Page 43 and 44: 500 psig and 6,000 psig. Compressiv
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 6. STATIC IMPACTS ON COMMERC
- Page 47: not pursued because frequency, ampl
- Page 51 and 52: THEORETICAL ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENT
- Page 53 and 54: D.Rockwell, E.Naudascher, Thomas an
- Page 55 and 56: Fig. 3 Flow model Hence we can comp
- Page 57 and 58: amplitude decreases suddenly when c
- Page 59 and 60: Where T: wave function period If we
- Page 61 and 62: Fig.14 Variation of dimensionless r
- Page 63 and 64: EXPERIMENTAL RESULT ANALYSIS (1) Th
- Page 65 and 66: Fig.19 Amplification factor versus
- Page 67 and 68: DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF WATERJET
- Page 69 and 70: A piezoelectric transducer (Kistler
- Page 71 and 72: From the data obtained, it is clear
- Page 73 and 74: conjectured that this optimum signa
- Page 75 and 76: difference of impact forces with an
- Page 77 and 78: The pressure of the jet is not an i
- Page 79 and 80: near the nozzle exit in the mixing
- Page 81 and 82: etween 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm. Full- fie
- Page 83 and 84: earlier observations that cavitatio
- Page 85 and 86: Obstructed Conical Nozzle The nozzl
- Page 87 and 88: CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF A W
- Page 89 and 90: An experimental mechanism was desig
- Page 91 and 92: horn and the modification of the st
- Page 93 and 94: ased on more detailed examination o
- Page 95 and 96: DEVELOPMENT OF CAVITATING JET EQUIP
- Page 97 and 98: hole, a total 23 minutes was requir
- Page 99 and 100:
from 1.5 to 4 ft to be cut. Other f
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 2 Summary of CCPC Pavement Cu
- Page 103 and 104:
All of the experimental modules wer
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 10. Effect of CAVIJET R cutt
- Page 107 and 108:
HYDRO DEMOLITION - TECHNOLOGY FOR P
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 1. Air entrained concrete pr
- Page 111 and 112:
TABLE II used a mean rating because
- Page 113 and 114:
As work loads grew and costs escala
- Page 115 and 116:
inches deep of deteriorated bridge
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 6. Atlas Copco Conjet removi
- Page 119 and 120:
6. Total Ownership Cost Per Day $ 9
- Page 121 and 122:
ABRASIVE-WATERJET AND WATERJET TECH
- Page 123 and 124:
Commercial nuclear power plant deco
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 3. Components of rotating no
- Page 127 and 128:
shroud and catching system designed
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 9. Effect of abrasive size.
- Page 131 and 132:
alternative abrasive material. The
- Page 133 and 134:
four arms leading to nozzle holders
- Page 135 and 136:
surrounding grout, they tended to r
- Page 137 and 138:
12. Hashish, M. “Steel Cutting wi
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 1 Kerf test stand pressure v
- Page 141 and 142:
Figure 3 Kerf area versus standoff
- Page 143 and 144:
The ratio of kerf depth to width or
- Page 145 and 146:
where: x c = u o d o ( ) (1) 4v e l
- Page 147 and 148:
Depending on the rock type γ can v
- Page 149 and 150:
CONICAL WATER JET DRILLING W. Dicki
- Page 151 and 152:
feed line. A conical cutting fluid
- Page 153 and 154:
A second series of tests at the ful
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 8. 6061-T6 aluminum cut with
- Page 157 and 158:
serves to reduce tool wear (8). It
- Page 159 and 160:
Traverse speed is the velocity of t
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 4: Diagram illustrating the
- Page 163 and 164:
The picture changes dramatically wh
- Page 165 and 166:
Analysis of the residuals of these
- Page 167 and 168:
5. Hood, M., "Cutting Strong Rock w
- Page 169 and 170:
hundred feet-per-second. At these v
- Page 171 and 172:
Figure 1. Typical Nozzle Configurat
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 5. Expanded Signal from an I
- Page 175 and 176:
where: V w = water velocity F = mea
- Page 177 and 178:
HYDRO-ABRASIVE CUTTING HEAD—ENERG
- Page 179 and 180:
Figure 3. Percentage of initial abr
- Page 181 and 182:
Figure 6. Location of optimum recei
- Page 183 and 184:
WATER JET ASSISTED LONGWALL SHEARER
- Page 185 and 186:
• reduction of the proportion of
- Page 187 and 188:
The conversion set for the shearer
- Page 189 and 190:
into account. As far as possible no
- Page 191 and 192:
gal/yd 3 ). Another important influ
- Page 193 and 194:
At approximately 2 m/s (393 fpm), a
- Page 195 and 196:
Proceedings of the 8th Internationa
- Page 197 and 198:
κ = permeability of rock at atmosp
- Page 199 and 200:
operating parameters (P. V tr , etc
- Page 201 and 202:
κ = permeability at 1 atm. pressur
- Page 203 and 204:
was substantial gain in the depth o
- Page 205 and 206:
Figure 9. Plot of exposure rate aga
- Page 207 and 208:
For nozzle C2, a = 0.5 x 10 4 and b
- Page 209 and 210:
204
- Page 211 and 212:
Deep drilling or slotting requires
- Page 213 and 214:
imparted by an air motor coupled to
- Page 215 and 216:
Conventional rotary or percussive r
- Page 217 and 218:
A RELATIVE CLEANABILITY FACTOR A. F
- Page 219 and 220:
Relation [6] was used to derive the
- Page 221 and 222:
which has been observed for much of
- Page 223 and 224:
As part of a project to develop the
- Page 225 and 226:
Figure 1. Cost per square foot clea
- Page 227 and 228:
Abrasive Feed Rate The effect of ab
- Page 229 and 230:
Figure 4. Total cost per square foo
- Page 231 and 232:
3. Barker, C. R.; Mazurkiewicz, M.
- Page 233 and 234:
For our purposes here, we will lump
- Page 235 and 236:
Surface condensers can be cleaned b
- Page 237 and 238:
Some Powerlance customers have 20,0
- Page 239 and 240:
system could be designed that was o
- Page 241 and 242:
236
- Page 243 and 244:
ROTARY WATERBLAST LANCING MACHINES
- Page 245 and 246:
Motors and Gearing An advantage of
- Page 247 and 248:
The DuPont Company in LaPlace, Loui
- Page 249 and 250:
Fig 3 Heavy duty Rotary Lancing Mac
- Page 251 and 252:
D L - lower diameter of through hol
- Page 253 and 254:
Figure 1. A - single-pass, rough ke
- Page 255 and 256:
The erosion process is stochastic i
- Page 257 and 258:
three dimensional controlled erosio
- Page 259 and 260:
This can only be regarded as a simp
- Page 261 and 262:
approximately zero. Time constant T
- Page 263 and 264:
Figure 12. Transients of HAJM cycli
- Page 265 and 266:
T A = (f, h o, p, s o, f o, c, . .
- Page 267 and 268:
SURFACE FINISH CHARACTERIZATION IN
- Page 269 and 270:
FIG. 2 Force Sensor Designed for Cu
- Page 271 and 272:
system can be used in the developme
- Page 273 and 274:
Figure 8 Cutting Force versus Cutti
- Page 275 and 276:
nearly at the center of the ceramic
- Page 277 and 278:
ABRASIVE WATERJET CUTTING OF METAL
- Page 279 and 280:
Figure 1. Experimental setup, inclu
- Page 281 and 282:
Figure 3. Scanning microphotograph
- Page 283 and 284:
Figure 8. Effect of cutting speed o
- Page 285 and 286:
a. Scanning microphotograph, lOOOx
- Page 287 and 288:
c. Silicon image 1000x Figure 16. S