02.07.2017 Views

QinetiQ Annual Report 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>QinetiQ</strong> Group plc <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> and Accounts <strong>2017</strong><br />

Governance | Independent auditor’s report<br />

97<br />

US Global Products goodwill –<br />

£43.4 million (2016: £37.9 million)<br />

Refer to page 61 (<strong>Report</strong> of the Audit Committee),<br />

page 107 (accounting policy note) and page 121<br />

(financial disclosures).<br />

The risk:<br />

Forecast based valuation<br />

The carrying value of goodwill associated with the<br />

US Global Products business was written down to its<br />

recoverable amount in the year ended 31 March 2016.<br />

As a result, any deterioration in these projections or an<br />

increase in the discount rate applied may result in a further<br />

write down being required. The carrying value of the US<br />

Global Products goodwill has been reassessed in <strong>2017</strong><br />

based on the discounted projected cash flows of this<br />

business, which are inherently uncertain due to the<br />

variability of future sales and product mix, and selection of<br />

an appropriate discount rate used for the purposes of the<br />

impairment calculations. Whilst the projections anticipate<br />

future growth based on <strong>2017</strong> performance, there remains<br />

uncertainty around the impact of new revenue streams<br />

and demand for the current portfolio of products.<br />

Our response:<br />

Our procedures included:<br />

Assessing methodology: Testing the principles and<br />

mathematical integrity of the Group’s discounted<br />

cash flow model;<br />

Benchmarking assumptions: With the assistance of<br />

our valuation specialists, we assessed the growth and<br />

discount rate used in the impairment calculation by<br />

comparing the Group’s assumptions to external data;<br />

Our sector experience: Challenging the cash flow<br />

projections by reviewing the timing of new revenue<br />

streams and product mix against market conditions<br />

and the current level of sales;<br />

Sensitivity analysis: Testing the sensitivity of the<br />

impairment calculation to changes in the underlying<br />

assumptions;<br />

Assessing disclosures: Assessing whether the Group’s<br />

disclosures about the sensitivity of the outcome of the<br />

impairment assessment to changes in key assumptions<br />

properly reflected the risks inherent in the valuation<br />

of goodwill.<br />

Other payables, provisions and contingent liabilities<br />

– included within other payables of £157.6 million<br />

(2016: £163.3 million), provisions of £24.0 million<br />

(2016: £19.1 million) and contingent liabilities<br />

of £Nil (2016: £Nil)<br />

Refer to page 61(<strong>Report</strong> of the Audit Committee),<br />

page 109 (accounting policy note) and page 127<br />

(financial disclosures).<br />

The risk:<br />

Subjective estimates<br />

The Group holds provisions in respect of contractual,<br />

legal and regulatory issues. The Group operates in<br />

regulated environments and a failure to comply with<br />

particular regulations could result in fines and/or<br />

penalties. There is judgement required in determining<br />

the significance of any instances of potential noncompliance<br />

and potential liability based on<br />

management’s assessment of the most likely outcome.<br />

The financial statements should disclose any contingent<br />

liabilities in respect of contractual, regulatory or legal<br />

issues which have not been provided for on the basis<br />

that they are not considered to qualify for recognition<br />

as provisions. This is one of our key areas of audit focus.<br />

Our response:<br />

Our procedures included:<br />

Our sector experience: Critical assessment of the extent<br />

to which the Directors’ estimates take into account a<br />

balanced assessment of the latest available information<br />

and the accuracy and reliability of the sources of that<br />

information;<br />

Benchmarking assumptions: We corroborated the<br />

appropriateness of the Directors’ assumptions by<br />

reference to third party confirmations and legal<br />

advice, where available;<br />

Historical comparison and sector experience: We<br />

considered whether our understanding of the business<br />

gained throughout the audit process corroborated<br />

the provisions recorded. We challenged the Directors’<br />

estimates of the most likely outcomes based on<br />

the range of possible outcomes to determine if<br />

the amounts provided are appropriate;<br />

Assessing disclosures: We considered the adequacy<br />

of the Group’s disclosures in respect of other payables,<br />

provisions and contingent liabilities.<br />

Tax provisioning – current tax payable £43.7 million<br />

(2016: £39.9 million), deferred tax asset £5.4 million<br />

(2015: £4.1 million)<br />

Refer to page 61(<strong>Report</strong> of the Audit Committee), page<br />

107 (accounting policy note) and pages 124 and 127<br />

(financial disclosures).<br />

The risk:<br />

Subjective estimates<br />

The Group is subject to income taxes in the UK, USA<br />

and a number of other overseas jurisdictions. The level<br />

of current tax and deferred tax recognised requires<br />

judgements as to the likely outcome of decisions to be<br />

made by the tax authorities. This includes those related<br />

to specific tax allowances, such as the UK Research<br />

and Development tax credit. There is a risk that the<br />

judgements on which the provisions are based do not<br />

take into account or do not properly reflect the latest<br />

available, reliable information or an appropriate<br />

application of relevant tax legislation, and are either<br />

under or overstated as a result.<br />

Our response:<br />

Our procedures included:<br />

Our expertise: Challenging the appropriateness of the<br />

Directors’ assumptions and estimates in relation to tax<br />

assets and liabilities, by critically assessing the range of<br />

possible amounts that may be assessed under tax laws,<br />

likely settlements based on the latest correspondence<br />

with the relevant tax authorities and the complexity of<br />

the relevant tax legislation. We involved our own tax<br />

specialists in analysing and challenging the assumptions<br />

used to determine tax provisions based on our<br />

knowledge and experience of the application of the<br />

legislation by the relevant authorities and courts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!