Nestorius

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATION PROF. M. M. NINAN THE CHALCEDONIAN CREED 451 AD This creed was adopted at the Fourth Ecumenical Council, held at Chalcedon, located in what is now Turkey, in 451 AD, as a response to certain heretical views concerning the nature of Christ. It established the orthodox view that Christ has two natures (human and divine) that are unified in one person. We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach men to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body; consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; I n all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ; as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us. In summary, the Definition confesses Jesus Christ is “one person, who is both divine and human.” Though its wording has been criticized as inadequate, it has helped the church in “setting the limits beyond which error lies” in speaking of the human and divine union in Christ. The Definition confesses the gospel message that Jesus Christ assumed our fallen humanity in order to save us, 63
NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATION PROF. M. M. NINAN for as Gregory of Nazianzus (329-389), said, “That which he [Christ] has not assumed he has not healed; but that which is united to his Godhead is also saved.” Fifth Ecumenical Council 553 In their struggle against Nestorianism, some theologians went as far as the other extreme. They denied completely the presence of human nature in Jesus Christ, accepting only one Divine Nature in one Divine Hypostasis. Thus, they are called Monophysites (believers in one nature). 64
Page 2 and 3:
NESTORIUS UNDERSTANDING INCARNATION
Page 4 and 5:
NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATI
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17: NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATI
Page 20 and 21: o o NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCAR
Page 30 and 31: He was called Son of God (Mark 1:1)
Page 114 and 115: ARIANISM: WHO IS JESUS? PROF. M. M.
Page 116:
ARIANISM: WHO IS JESUS? PROF. M. M.
show all

Nestorius

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?