Nestorius

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATION PROF. M. M. NINAN it is understood that Jesus was at the same time both fully God and fully human, two persons in one nature.The body of Christ was therefore subject to all the bodily weaknesses to which human nature is universally subject; such are hunger (Matt.4:2), thirst (John 19:28), fatigue (John 4:6), pain, and death. They were the natural results of the human nature He assumed. Fortunately Nestorius himself has written an exhaustive account of his thesis in a book which was discovered in the 20 th century which presents a different angle on what he really taught. This book is known as The Bazaar of Heraclides. This book was written in exile at the Oasis, which survives in Syriac translation. It must have been written no earlier than 450 AD, as he knows of the death of the Emperor Theodosius II (29 July 450). In this book (i) He denies that the unity of Christ is a 'natural composition' in which two elements are combined by the will of some external 'creator'. (ii) He denies that the Incarnation was effected by changing godhead into manhood or vice versa, or by forming a tertium quid (a third personality) from those two ousiai. (iii) He denies that God was in Christ in the same way as in the saints. (iv) He denies that either the godhead or the manhood of Christ are 'fictitious' or 'phantasmal', and not real. (v) He denies that the Incarnation involved any change in the godhead, or any suffering on the part of the Divine Logos who, as divine, is by nature impassible. (vi) He denies that the union of two natures in one Christ involves any duality of sonship. (vii) He asserts that the union is a voluntary union of godhead and manhood. (viii) He asserts that the principle of union is to be found in the prosopa of the godhead and the manhood; these two prosdpa coalesced in one prosopon of Christ incarnate. (ix) He asserts that this view alone provides for a real Incarnation, makes possible faith in a real atonement, and provides a rationale of the sacramentalism of the Church. It is clear that the crux of the question is to be found in the eighth of these points, and that the difficulty arises from the difficulty of determining the sense in which Nestorius used the word prosopon. His own theory can be stated almost in a dozen words. It is this: Christ is the union of the eternal Logos and the Son of Mary, the principle of the union being that the πρόσωπον of each has been taken by the other, so that there is one πρόσωπον of the two in the union. As it appear, apparently Nestorius was not a Nestorian 85
NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATION PROF. M. M. NINAN History of the Nestorian Churches in a nut shell History of the Controversy based on Bazaar of Heracleides by Nestorius This summary is compiled from B. J. Kidd; A History of the Church to A.D. 461 (Oxford University Press, 1922), vol. iii, chs. xi-xvi. Date. Events. 428. April Nestorius becomes bishop of Constantinople Anastasius preaches against Theotokos. November Nestorius begins a course of sermons Christmas Day Protest of Eusebius (afterwards bishop of Dorylaeum) 429.Lady Day Proclus' sermon, replied to by Nestorius. Eastertide Nestorius preaches three sermons in reply to Proclus. Cyril sends his encyclical Ad Monachos Aegypti. Photius replies to it. Cyril stirs up accusers against Nestorius. Caelestine of Rome makes inquiries. Letters from Nestorius reach Caelestine June Cyril Ad Nestorium I Nestorius replies peacefully; his diocese is disturbed and he is not ready for war. 86
Page 2 and 3:
NESTORIUS UNDERSTANDING INCARNATION
Page 4 and 5:
NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATI
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
o o NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCAR
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
He was called Son of God (Mark 1:1)
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39: NESTORIUS : UNDERSTANDING INCARNATI
Page 114 and 115: ARIANISM: WHO IS JESUS? PROF. M. M.
Page 116: ARIANISM: WHO IS JESUS? PROF. M. M.
show all

Nestorius

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?