You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
STAGECRAFT<br />
NLRB Changes Under The<br />
Trump Administration And<br />
How They Affect The <strong>IATSE</strong><br />
The old adage is that “elections have consequences.” After a year of the Trump administrations NLRB<br />
rulings those consequences will directly affect the <strong>IATSE</strong> and its members. It is beyond the appointment<br />
of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and the upcoming Janus vs. AFSCME ruling which<br />
may hinder public sector unions. Lost in the news and not widely reported are changes that the Trump<br />
administration’s NLRB has implemented that directly affect us as represented workers in the live entertainment<br />
industry, the <strong>IATSE</strong>, unions, and working people as a whole.<br />
Since taking office in January, the<br />
Trump administration has implemented<br />
many changes for working<br />
people under the new leadership at the<br />
National Labor Relations Board. The<br />
Board is run by five members. After the<br />
Senate confirmed President Trump’s<br />
second pick to the NLRB, an attorney<br />
whose law firm specialized in union<br />
avoidance tactics with clients such as<br />
Fed Ex, Target, Uber, and Amazon, it<br />
effectively shifted the balance of power<br />
from Democrats to Republicans by a<br />
3-2 Republican majority. The Board<br />
was also temporarily chaired by Phillip<br />
Miscimarra, a corporate labor law attorney,<br />
who before the end of his term<br />
in December 2017 made decisions and<br />
took actions that will affect all workers<br />
and unions. Trump will also appoint his<br />
replacement.<br />
So, as quickly as possible, the GOP<br />
majority overturned the decisions that<br />
the NLRB made to strengthen workers’<br />
rights under Obama. The NLRB’s five<br />
major decisions, all of which were issued<br />
in one week, which happened to<br />
be Miscimarra’s last week of his term.<br />
Each of them was a 3–2 decision. What<br />
is most noticeable is that these changes<br />
at the NLRB were not done through the<br />
usual protocol of the past. The Board<br />
issued all of these decisions without<br />
public notice and without allowing interested<br />
parties to the cases the ability<br />
to file briefs. By doing this the NLRB<br />
reversed decisions that were supportive<br />
of workers and unions and will directly<br />
impede organizing unrepresented<br />
workers in the future.<br />
They started by overturning a decision<br />
requiring settlements to provide<br />
a “full remedy” to aggrieved workers.<br />
Next, the board reversed a decision reinforcing<br />
workers’ rights to organize<br />
WWW.<strong>IATSE</strong>.NET<br />
84 OFFICIAL BULLETIN