21.11.2018 Views

Smart Industry 2/2018

Smart Industry 2/2018 - The IoT Business Magazine - powered by Avnet Silica

Smart Industry 2/2018 - The IoT Business Magazine - powered by Avnet Silica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4-Step Model of Intelligent Process Automation<br />

From simple batch processing<br />

to self-teaching intelligent systems<br />

photo ©: Horváth & Partners<br />

Complexity<br />

1<br />

Robotic Process<br />

Automation (RPA)<br />

Software robots<br />

automate repetitive and/<br />

or rules-based processes<br />

using structured data<br />

2<br />

Cognitive<br />

Automation<br />

Complex processes<br />

are automated using<br />

unstructured data<br />

with the help of<br />

machine learning<br />

Degree of automation<br />

3<br />

Digital<br />

Assistants<br />

Software robots<br />

utilize both voice and<br />

text input (chatbots)<br />

to perform tasks based<br />

on natural language<br />

processing<br />

4<br />

Autonomous<br />

Agents<br />

Complex software<br />

systems utilize<br />

deep learning<br />

to reach decisions<br />

autonomously<br />

and initiate processes<br />

to automate key<br />

functions<br />

Degree of artificial intelligence<br />

future thinking to existing facilities<br />

that look nothing like that. In fact, he<br />

notes, many of his company’s sensors<br />

are found in steel mills, sewage treatment<br />

facilities, and offshore oil plants.<br />

Sean Gough, director of product management<br />

at the company says the<br />

route from IoT sensors to RPA in all<br />

those facilities usually starts with local<br />

intelligence, where initial analysis<br />

can help reduce the deluge of data to<br />

something more manageable. “People<br />

are working to get to the right<br />

level of local analytics so that they are<br />

transmitting and analyzing the right<br />

level of data at each layer,” he says.<br />

Certainly, getting data to where it is<br />

needed is a challenge. Hard-wiring<br />

sensors used to be standard practice,<br />

but particularly where customers<br />

want to retrofit, “the only practical<br />

method is often to use radio,” says<br />

Gough. He says the company is now<br />

combining sensors and radio in a single<br />

device.<br />

According to Smith, customers want<br />

the ability to integrate as much as<br />

possible. In response, the company<br />

is making sensors that are digital and<br />

adding microprocessors, primarily for<br />

self-test, so they can know whether<br />

the sensors are operating properly,<br />

he explains. But the desire to process<br />

more at the edge is likely to increase.<br />

How much value can you get from<br />

automation? “A lot of our customers<br />

are on a discovery mission to understand<br />

how this will help them,” Smith<br />

says. “We think there is no limit,” he<br />

adds.<br />

Making the case<br />

Both RPA and IoT have those who<br />

claim they can demonstrate strong<br />

ROI. Of course, the specifics vary.<br />

Some projects produce stellar results<br />

and others are not so impressive.<br />

However, according to a Tata Consulting<br />

Services blog, RPA is demonstrating<br />

ROI “in about 25 percent of the<br />

time required for a business process<br />

workflow solution and 16 percent of<br />

the time taken for enterprise application<br />

integration to demonstrate significant<br />

value.”<br />

A recent article posted by ISG Research,<br />

“Is IT a Catalyst or Adversary of<br />

Your RPA Initiative?,” revealed the results<br />

of a survey of 549 European business<br />

leaders regarding their adoption<br />

of RPA technology and services. One<br />

finding was that in EMEA, the CIO is<br />

usually responsible or accountable for<br />

the RPA buying decision (81 percent)<br />

but 57 percent of organizations surveyed<br />

said they were stymied in their<br />

RPA endeavors by “Lack of IT support”<br />

and “Governance/compliance” issues.<br />

The road to RPA<br />

The evolution of<br />

robotoc process<br />

automation can be<br />

seen as a series of<br />

steps towards everincreasing<br />

levels of<br />

automation and<br />

artificial intelligence.<br />

The article’s authors, Keri Smith and<br />

Aparna Gajanan, observe “if you consider<br />

automation a team sport, both<br />

the business side and the IT organization<br />

must play together to advance<br />

the ball.”<br />

They also observed that though CIOs<br />

often have responsibility for RPA buying,<br />

implementation is often handled<br />

by others, including CFOs and shared<br />

services leaders. Furthermore, despite<br />

a widespread belief that RPA is<br />

“intuitive” and doesn’t require IT involvement,<br />

in fact “RPA is not a plugand-play<br />

capability; it requires people<br />

with technical and business skills to<br />

plan, develop, deploy and manage it.”<br />

Earlier this year, ISG also weighed in<br />

on the broader outlook for advanced<br />

business use of RPA in Europe, which<br />

they expect will double by 2020, as<br />

companies seek to improve customer<br />

experience and streamline their finance<br />

operations.<br />

ISG and Automation Anywhere, an<br />

RPA software provider, recently surveyed<br />

European business leaders and<br />

found that that fewer than 10% of<br />

companies will not have begun working<br />

on RPA by 2020, while those at an<br />

advanced stage will have doubled.<br />

While Europe has been slower to<br />

adopt technologies like automation<br />

than other markets, according<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!