04.12.2018 Views

THE ACCOUNTANT_AUTUMN_2018_VER-7-L

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FEATURE<br />

CPE FOR <strong>ACCOUNTANT</strong>S:<br />

A NECESSARY BURDEN?<br />

It is all a matter of trust! For many years, accountants have been the foundation of business interactions; providing information<br />

to managers, shareholders, and investors for decision-making. This responsibility imposes multiple duties on accountants,<br />

one being to remain relevant and up-to-date with changes taking place in their professional environment.<br />

MAT<strong>THE</strong>W SCIBERRAS<br />

MAT<strong>THE</strong>W SCIBERRAS<br />

GRADUATED WITH A MASTER IN<br />

ACCOUNTANCY DEGREE FROM<br />

<strong>THE</strong> UNI<strong>VER</strong>SITY OF MALTA. HE<br />

IS CURRENTLY WORKING WITHIN<br />

<strong>THE</strong> COMPANY ADMINISTRATION<br />

AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES<br />

TEAM AT PWC.<br />

Working in a Dynamic Environment<br />

In the last couple of years, the accountancy world has<br />

been characterised by an endless wave of changes in<br />

accounting principles, standards and regulations. These<br />

changes have placed a huge burden on accountants,<br />

resulting in a challenge for professional maintenance<br />

which, if not dealt with leads to outdated skills and<br />

knowledge. One should also keep in mind that<br />

accountants are not only concerned with changes taking<br />

place in accounting standards, but also in any change that<br />

takes place within their clients’ industry. This inevitably<br />

imposes a duty on accountants to continuously update<br />

their skills and knowledge, which requires commitment<br />

from the accountants’ side, together with openmindedness<br />

towards change.<br />

Leaping the Hurdle of Professional Maintenance<br />

With 90.7% of local accountants considering the duty to<br />

maintain professional competence as a challenge in their<br />

profession, there was a statistical significance indicating<br />

that accountants need a proper professional maintenance<br />

tool. Presuming that Continuing Professional Education<br />

(CPE) fulfils its purpose in this regard, regulators adopted<br />

CPE as a tool to equip practitioners for the dynamic<br />

world out there. If CPE fulfils this purpose, the public<br />

should benefit from peace of mind that accountants<br />

are technically competent and up-to-date with changes<br />

taking place in the profession. However, the question<br />

arises; is CPE fulfilling this purpose?<br />

The Undesired Reality<br />

In reality, most accountants do not feel that the<br />

mandatory CPE requirement is providing reasonable<br />

assurance to the society that accountants are technically<br />

competent. This lack of confidence in CPE among the<br />

local accountancy profession can be blamed on the<br />

common perception among practitioners that CPE has<br />

become the hours one needs to secure his warrant,<br />

rather than a means of professional development.<br />

Although most professionals want CPE activities to confer<br />

legitimacy on their learning, most of the practitioners<br />

and their employers do not believe that compliance with<br />

the current requirement could genuinely demonstrate<br />

their competence. This issue relates to what is referred to<br />

by most as the compliance mentality.<br />

The main cause of this mentality was the shift<br />

adopted by most regulators from voluntary to mandatory<br />

CPE policies. The prevalent attitude among accountants<br />

is that attendance at CPE sessions is happening just<br />

for the sake of meeting the requirement. This shows<br />

that in certain instances attendance at CPE activities is<br />

not reflecting real competency, but rather regulatory<br />

compliance. Besides this, accountants are highly sceptical<br />

about the validity of course attendance certificates.<br />

The majority believe that certificates of attendance<br />

only indicate physical presence and not professional<br />

development. Certificates of attendance are not a proof<br />

that an individual has gained professional development<br />

from a CPE activity; not even whether the individual has<br />

even paid attention to the speaker.<br />

Even though most practitioners blame the<br />

mandatory nature of CPE as the cause for this mentality,<br />

they still prefer and support mandatory policies. The<br />

majority argue that without a mandatory requirement,<br />

time and work pressures will suppress any motivation<br />

for one to engage in CPE, which is the ultimate<br />

drawback of a voluntary approach. Moreover, the<br />

mandatory requirement strengthens the reputation of<br />

22 Autumn <strong>2018</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!