THE ACCOUNTANT_AUTUMN_2018_VER-7-L
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FEATURE<br />
CPE FOR <strong>ACCOUNTANT</strong>S:<br />
A NECESSARY BURDEN?<br />
It is all a matter of trust! For many years, accountants have been the foundation of business interactions; providing information<br />
to managers, shareholders, and investors for decision-making. This responsibility imposes multiple duties on accountants,<br />
one being to remain relevant and up-to-date with changes taking place in their professional environment.<br />
MAT<strong>THE</strong>W SCIBERRAS<br />
MAT<strong>THE</strong>W SCIBERRAS<br />
GRADUATED WITH A MASTER IN<br />
ACCOUNTANCY DEGREE FROM<br />
<strong>THE</strong> UNI<strong>VER</strong>SITY OF MALTA. HE<br />
IS CURRENTLY WORKING WITHIN<br />
<strong>THE</strong> COMPANY ADMINISTRATION<br />
AND ACCOUNTING SERVICES<br />
TEAM AT PWC.<br />
Working in a Dynamic Environment<br />
In the last couple of years, the accountancy world has<br />
been characterised by an endless wave of changes in<br />
accounting principles, standards and regulations. These<br />
changes have placed a huge burden on accountants,<br />
resulting in a challenge for professional maintenance<br />
which, if not dealt with leads to outdated skills and<br />
knowledge. One should also keep in mind that<br />
accountants are not only concerned with changes taking<br />
place in accounting standards, but also in any change that<br />
takes place within their clients’ industry. This inevitably<br />
imposes a duty on accountants to continuously update<br />
their skills and knowledge, which requires commitment<br />
from the accountants’ side, together with openmindedness<br />
towards change.<br />
Leaping the Hurdle of Professional Maintenance<br />
With 90.7% of local accountants considering the duty to<br />
maintain professional competence as a challenge in their<br />
profession, there was a statistical significance indicating<br />
that accountants need a proper professional maintenance<br />
tool. Presuming that Continuing Professional Education<br />
(CPE) fulfils its purpose in this regard, regulators adopted<br />
CPE as a tool to equip practitioners for the dynamic<br />
world out there. If CPE fulfils this purpose, the public<br />
should benefit from peace of mind that accountants<br />
are technically competent and up-to-date with changes<br />
taking place in the profession. However, the question<br />
arises; is CPE fulfilling this purpose?<br />
The Undesired Reality<br />
In reality, most accountants do not feel that the<br />
mandatory CPE requirement is providing reasonable<br />
assurance to the society that accountants are technically<br />
competent. This lack of confidence in CPE among the<br />
local accountancy profession can be blamed on the<br />
common perception among practitioners that CPE has<br />
become the hours one needs to secure his warrant,<br />
rather than a means of professional development.<br />
Although most professionals want CPE activities to confer<br />
legitimacy on their learning, most of the practitioners<br />
and their employers do not believe that compliance with<br />
the current requirement could genuinely demonstrate<br />
their competence. This issue relates to what is referred to<br />
by most as the compliance mentality.<br />
The main cause of this mentality was the shift<br />
adopted by most regulators from voluntary to mandatory<br />
CPE policies. The prevalent attitude among accountants<br />
is that attendance at CPE sessions is happening just<br />
for the sake of meeting the requirement. This shows<br />
that in certain instances attendance at CPE activities is<br />
not reflecting real competency, but rather regulatory<br />
compliance. Besides this, accountants are highly sceptical<br />
about the validity of course attendance certificates.<br />
The majority believe that certificates of attendance<br />
only indicate physical presence and not professional<br />
development. Certificates of attendance are not a proof<br />
that an individual has gained professional development<br />
from a CPE activity; not even whether the individual has<br />
even paid attention to the speaker.<br />
Even though most practitioners blame the<br />
mandatory nature of CPE as the cause for this mentality,<br />
they still prefer and support mandatory policies. The<br />
majority argue that without a mandatory requirement,<br />
time and work pressures will suppress any motivation<br />
for one to engage in CPE, which is the ultimate<br />
drawback of a voluntary approach. Moreover, the<br />
mandatory requirement strengthens the reputation of<br />
22 Autumn <strong>2018</strong>