18.12.2012 Views

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Effect of In Vivo Delivery of Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Through a Novel T-tube<br />

Chamber on Behavioural Recovery in a Rat Model of Peripheral Nerve Injury<br />

Institution where the work was prepared: University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada<br />

Stephen W.P. Kemp, BSc(Hons), MSc; Aubrey A. Webb; Rajiv Midha; University of Calgary<br />

Various behavioural measurements have traditionally been used to assess recovery following peripheral nerve transection, including the<br />

sciatic functional index (SFI), video gait analysis and ankle rotation measures. However, direct measures that objectively and sensitively<br />

assess the return of sensorimotor function in peripheral nerve injured animals are currently lacking. We sought to assess the extent of<br />

behavioural recovery in both skilled and unskilled sensorimotor tasks, especially locomotion, in normal rats both be<strong>for</strong>e and after unilateral<br />

injury to the right sciatic nerve. In addition to traditional methods of sciatic nerve repair, the effect of in vivo delivery of nerve growth<br />

factor (NGF) was evaluated using a novel T-tube chamber nerve conduit. Animals were randomly assigned to one of five treatment<br />

groups: nerve crush (Group 1); direct suture repair (Group 2); transection and T-tube repair with saline administration (Group 3); transection<br />

and T-tube repair with NGF (800 pg/day) administration (Group 4), and; sham-operated controls (Group 5). Locomotor measurements<br />

consisted of (1) ladder rung; (2) tapered beam with crutch; (3) quantitative kinematics, and; (4) ground reaction <strong>for</strong>ce determination.<br />

Ground reaction <strong>for</strong>ce determination, in particular, provides a sensitive assessment of behavioural recovery by allowing the analysis<br />

of each limb's contribution to vertical (body weight support), <strong>for</strong>e-aft (braking and propulsion), and mediolateral <strong>for</strong>ces during locomotion.<br />

Sensory testing consisted of two parts: (1) a traditional measure of tactile allodynia was assessed via von Frey filament testing, and;<br />

(2) thermal nociception was evaluated using a modified thermal <strong>plan</strong>tar test. Following serial and final endpoint behavioural measures (3<br />

months), EMG measurements assessed both nerve and muscle conduction velocities. Animals were subsequently sacrificed and final outcome<br />

measures consisted of (1) gastrocnemius muscle weights, and; (2) morphometry (axon/myelination) of EPON embedded section<br />

tissue. Preliminary results indicate that our battery of locomotor tests provide a sensitive, comprehensive, and objective means by which<br />

to evaluate peripheral nerve regeneration. Ongoing evaluation aims to further determine whether animals directly administered NGF<br />

within a T-tube environment show improved sensorimotor behavioural recovery compared to animals administered saline.<br />

Nerve Repair with Introduction of a MEMS-Based Neural Electrode is Not Detrimental to<br />

Muscle Reinnervation<br />

Institution where the work was prepared: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA<br />

Melanie G. Urbanchek, MS, PhD; Antonio P. Peramo, PhD; Daryl R. Kipke, PhD; William M. Kuzon Jr, MD, PhD; Paul S.<br />

Cederna, PhD; University of Michigan<br />

Bioengineers are constructing Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) that contain integrated sensors, actuators, and electronics on<br />

a common silicon microelectrode substrate. MEMS devices can per<strong>for</strong>m complex functions in small areas such as peripheral nerves.<br />

MEMS could be im<strong>plan</strong>ted within a severed peripheral nerve to detect efferent signals <strong>for</strong> powering prostheses or providing afferent<br />

signals <strong>for</strong> sensory feedback. This closed-loop neural control of a prosthesis would provide a dramatic increase in functionality <strong>for</strong> upper<br />

extremity amputees. To achieve this goal, we designed a series of experiments testing the compatibility of MEMS electrodes on axonal<br />

sprouting, regeneration and subsequent muscle reinnervation following neurorrhaphy.<br />

We studied F344 rat peroneal nerve reinnervation of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle. Our 3 experimental groups received<br />

either no peroneal nerve surgery (Normal), division and repair surgery (Repair), or division and repair with a MEMS electrode introduced<br />

into the distal end of the neurorrhaphy (Repair+Electrode). Each silicon electrode was 10mm X .4mm X 15um with 16 shanks and<br />

embedded inactive wiring. Operated rats recovered <strong>for</strong> 58-87 days which is early in the postoperative recovery prior to achievement of<br />

maximal reinnervation. EDL maximum tetanic isometric <strong>for</strong>ce (Fo) was measured in situ by supramaximal stimulation of the peroneal<br />

nerve proximal to the nerve repair. Peroneal nerve conduction velocity was measured. The EDL muscle was then harvested, weighed,<br />

and the specific <strong>for</strong>ce (sFo) was calculated based upon the muscle cross sectional area.<br />

The EDL muscles of the Repair (-43%) and the Repair+Electrode (-33%) groups produced less maximal <strong>for</strong>ce when compared with the<br />

Normal group but did not differ from each other. There were no significant differences between the Repair and Repair+Electrode<br />

groups in muscle mass, Fo, sFo, or nerve conduction velocity indicating that the presence of the MEMS probe did not adversely effect<br />

nerve regeneration or muscle reinnervation based upon these outcome measurements.<br />

This study demonstrates that decreased maximal <strong>for</strong>ces early in the reinnervation process discriminate repaired nerve/muscle from normal<br />

<strong>for</strong> both nerve repair groups. Most importantly the lack of a significant difference between repair groups indicates that intraneural<br />

placement of a MEMS silicon electrode within the peroneal nerve did not adversely effect muscle reinnervation early in recovery.<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!