Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...
Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...
Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Comparison of FiberLoop and Supramid in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair Using a Cyclic Protocol<br />
Institution where the work was prepared: Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA<br />
Aaron Anderson, MD; S. Chase Donnelly; Richard Drake, PhD; Kathleen Derwin, PhD; Jeff Lawton, MD; Cleveland Clinic<br />
INTRODUCTION:<br />
Many suture methods and materials are used <strong>for</strong> zone II flexor tendon repairs. The ideal repair should be strong enough to allow early<br />
range of motion while facilitating tendon glide through the pulley system. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences<br />
in gap <strong>for</strong>mation and failure load between FiberLoop (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL) and Supramid (S. Jackson Inc., Alexandria, VA) sutures<br />
in zone II flexor tendon repairs using a human cadaveric model under cyclic loading.<br />
METHODS:<br />
Twenty paired flexor tendons from human, cadaveric hands were used to test the repair strength of FiberLoop versus Supramid suture.<br />
FDP Tendons were obtained from the ring, middle, and index fingers, transected in zone II, and repaired with either 4-0 FiberLoop or<br />
4-0 looped Supramid suture using a standard 8-strand cruciate repair technique followed by a running epitendinous 6-0 prolene suture.<br />
The repaired tendons were then clamped and mounted on a material testing system (MTS, Eden Prairie MN) preloaded to 2N and<br />
cycled 8000 times between 2N and 25N at a frequency of 1 Hz. Specimens were then pulled at a rate of 12mm/min until failure, defined<br />
as either the maximum load or a point corresponding to a drop in load of 10% or more of maximum during the failure test. Suture markers<br />
were placed on both sides of the repair site to analyze gap <strong>for</strong>mation across the repair during testing with an optical system.<br />
Outcome measures included gap <strong>for</strong>mation at 8000 cycles and failure load. Statistical differences were analyzed using a paired t-test<br />
(p