18.12.2012 Views

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Limiting Complications and Complexity of the Transverse Upper Gracilis Flap in Breast<br />

Reconstruction<br />

Institution where the work was prepared: University of Manitoba, winnipeg, Canada<br />

Edward Wayne Buchel; Thomas E.J. Hayakawa; University of Manitoba<br />

PURPOSE:<br />

The Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) flap has become a reliable second choice <strong>for</strong> autologous breast reconstruction. Complications<br />

associated with the TUG flap still limit it's routine use. Our institution has evolved it's technique over the past several months in an<br />

attempt tp decrease these complications. The purpose is to highlight the complications associated with the Transverse Upper Gracilis<br />

(TUG ) flap in breast reconstruction and suggest changes in technique to limit the complications and complexity of the operation.<br />

METHODS:<br />

A retrospective review of the microsurgical data base over the past 24 months was completed on all patients having a TUG flap <strong>for</strong><br />

breast reconstruction. Complications related to the donor site and reconstruction site were quantified. Video documentation of the harvesting<br />

technique and patient positioning was also completed.<br />

RESULTS:<br />

31 Free TUG flaps in 25 patients were per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. All patients did not have abdominal<br />

tissue available <strong>for</strong> autologous tissue transfer. One complete failure occurred secondary to a harvesting error. All other flaps survived.<br />

Fat necrosis was noted in 11 flaps (35.4%) of whom 3 underwent secondary revision of small superior contour irregularities. Donor<br />

site complications occurred in 8 donor sites ( 25.8%) with 1 requiring a return to the operating room <strong>for</strong> closure her wounds.<br />

CONCLUSION:<br />

The TUG flap is quickly becoming an excellent second choice <strong>for</strong> autologous tissue breast reconstruction. While fat necrosis and donor<br />

occurred frequently early on in our experience, changes in technique have limited these complications while decreasing the complexity<br />

of the operation.<br />

LEARNING OBJECTIVES:<br />

Review the harvesting techniques of the TUG flap. Highlight complications specific to the TUG flap and technique changes to decrease<br />

these complications.<br />

Outcome of Radical Excision and Microsurgical Reconstruction in Patients with Recurrent<br />

Oromucosal Cancer and Secondary Primary Cancer<br />

Institution where the work was prepared: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan<br />

Emre Gazyakan, MD, MSc; Holger Engel, MD; Jung-Ju Huang, MD; Huang-Kai Kao, MD; Ming-Huei Cheng, MD, PhD;<br />

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital<br />

INTRODUCTION:<br />

Recurrent oromucosal cancer and secondary primary cancer are predominant destructive cancers with significant morbidity and mortality.<br />

In most cases it leads to major midface- and mandibular-defects. Although the extensive defects are posing a challenge to the<br />

microsurgeon the possibilities <strong>for</strong> reconstruction should outweigh the fear of radical tumor resection to minimize recurrence. In the case<br />

of recurrence most patients are still treated with chemo- and/or radiotherapy alone. This study was to investigate the outcome of radical<br />

excision with microsurgical free tissue coverage <strong>for</strong> recurrent oromucosal cancers.<br />

MATERIAL/METHODS:<br />

Between 1999 and 2005, 45 men and 1 woman with a median age of 49.4 years with oromucosal cancer underwent radical excision with<br />

106 microsurgical free tissue transfers. Indications were recurrence, osteoradionecrosis and plate exposure. Patients with recurrence<br />

who received a second or third radical excision with microsurgical free tissue coverage were included in this study. The outcome was<br />

compared in the rate of recurrence, the overall survival rate and the operative complication rate. A comprehensive follow up was available<br />

<strong>for</strong> a minimum of 48 months.<br />

RESULTS:<br />

The initial TNM staging showed T1 in 7, T2 in 13, T3 in 12 and T4 in 14 cases. N0 was shown in 22, N1 in 13 and N2 in 11 patients respectively.<br />

13 Patients received postoperative radiation. Twenty-nine out of 46 patients (63%) were recurrent. Of these, 18 (39%) had disease<br />

recurrence at primary site and 11 (24%) developed a secondary primary tumor. No patient had distant metastasis in the mean 48 months<br />

of follow up. Most recurrences occurred within the first 12 months. These patients underwent the same surgical approach <strong>for</strong> the second<br />

time (20 anterior lateral thigh flaps (ALT) and 9 radial <strong>for</strong>earm flaps). Of these 29 patients, 3 (10%) developed <strong>for</strong> the second time<br />

recurrence. Two patients had a third tumor and one had local recurrence. In all cases an ALT-flap was per<strong>for</strong>med. 5 patients (17%) were<br />

lost to follow up due to disease related death. The rest of the 24 patients (83%) are currently without recurrence. Surgical complications<br />

included flap failure (3.8%) and anastomosis insufficiency (1.9%) among others.<br />

DISCUSSION:<br />

Microsurgical free tissue transfer <strong>for</strong> recurrent oromucosal cancer and secondary primary cancer had a high success rate, minimal complications<br />

and a survival rate of 83% in 48 months. Aggressive wide tumor excision followed by microsurgical reconstruction after recurrence<br />

is a good option.<br />

201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!