18.12.2012 Views

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An Upper Limb Reach and Grasp Cycle <strong>for</strong> Children<br />

Institution where the work was prepared: Stan<strong>for</strong>d University, Stan<strong>for</strong>d, CA, USA<br />

Amy L. Ladd, MD; Erin Butler; Stephanie Louie; Wendy Wong; Andrew Rogers; Jessica Rose; Stan<strong>for</strong>d University<br />

Medical Center<br />

SUMMARY:<br />

We developed a ìReach and Graspî Cycle to evaluate upper limb motor per<strong>for</strong>mance in children, with consistent kinematic patterns<br />

emerging among control subjects <strong>for</strong> seven specified joint motions. The low coefficient of variation (CV) <strong>for</strong> elbow flexion/extension in<br />

each of the five phases of the Reach and Grasp cycle suggests a repeatable upper limb cycle <strong>for</strong> object evaluation of functional motor<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

INTRODUCTION:<br />

While a normative protocol exists <strong>for</strong> evaluating lower limb gait deficits [Schutte], kinematic analysis of the upper limb is more challenging<br />

and only recently examined [Mosqueda, Fitoussi]. We propose a ìReach and Graspî Cycle that is defined by upper limb kinematics<br />

and is consistent among children and adolescents.<br />

MATERIALS/METHODS:<br />

Three-dimensional kinematic data were recorded from 17 children (9 males and 8 females, ages 5-18 years) during a single Reach and<br />

Grasp cycle. We divided the upper limb ìReach and Graspî Cycle into five phases: 1) initial position, 2) reach and grasp an object placed<br />

at 75% total reach, 3) retract arm, bring object toward self, 4) reach and replace object, and 5) return arm to initial position (Figure 1).<br />

Light-reflective markers were placed on the children's torso and upper limbs, and a 3-D motion analysis system captured and processed<br />

upper limb kinematics <strong>for</strong> seven primary joint motions of the dominant arm and trunk (Motion Analysis Corportation, Santa Rosa, CA).<br />

We calculated the mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD) <strong>for</strong> every 2% increment of the cycle, and determined the coefficient of variation<br />

(CV) <strong>for</strong> elbow flexion/extension. We also evaluated upper limb kinematics <strong>for</strong> one child, age 6.5 years, with mild hemiplegic cerebral<br />

palsy (CP).<br />

RESULTS:<br />

Consistent normal kinematic patterns emerged <strong>for</strong> each of the seven motions: trunk flexion/ extension; shoulder elevation/ extension;<br />

shoulder rotation; elbow flexion/ extension; Forearm pronation/ supination; wrist flexion/ extension; and ulnar/ radial deviation. The<br />

mean ± 1 SD (CV) <strong>for</strong> peak elbow flexion/ extension in each of the five phases were: 82±13 (16%), 53±12 (22%), 127±6 (5%), 54±12 (22%),<br />

and 82± 14 (18%). The child with mild CP demonstrated decreased shoulder elevation, increased shoulder internal rotation, and<br />

reduced elbow extension, compared to the normative data. DISCUSSION The defined Reach and Grasp cycle has potential to provide<br />

an effective classification system <strong>for</strong> upper limb kinematics based on 3-D motion analysis. Such a system is necessary to advance our<br />

understanding of upper limb motor disorders and improve therapeutic modalities <strong>for</strong> the upper limb.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!