18.12.2012 Views

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

Floor plan - 2013 Annual Meeting - American Association for Hand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Comparison Of Superior Gluteal Artery Per<strong>for</strong>ator Flaps and Myocutaneous Flaps For Breast<br />

Reconstruction<br />

Institution where the work was prepared: University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA<br />

Mark Gelfand, MD; Brian Boyd, MD; William Shaw, MD; James Watson, MD; Andrew Da Lio, MD; University Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />

Los Angeles<br />

Use of the Superior Gluteal Artery (SGA) myocutaneous flap <strong>for</strong> breast reconstruction was popularized in the US by Shaw in 1983. At<br />

UCLA it was initially the main backup in patients who were not candidates <strong>for</strong> autologous lower abdominal tissue flaps. Later it was<br />

replaced by Superior Gluteal Artery Per<strong>for</strong>ator flap (SGAP). This flap, first introduced by Allen and Tucker in 1995, allowed <strong>for</strong> a much<br />

longer pedicle, leading to a simpler microvascular anastomosis, and obviated the need <strong>for</strong> vein grafts to access the internal mammary<br />

vessels. However, so far there has been no head to head comparison of these two flaps. We per<strong>for</strong>med retrospective chart review of<br />

102 operations in 80 patients. A total of 70 SGA and 32 SGAP flaps were per<strong>for</strong>med over a ten year period. Patients in SGAP group<br />

tended to lose significantly less blood (241 vs. 375 cc) and were less likely to require transfusion (9% vs. 11.4 %). There was no significant<br />

difference in length of surgery (505 min vs. 496 min) or hospital stay (4.4 vs. 4.7 days). Although the overall complication rate was<br />

higher in SGAP group (28% vs. 20%), it failed to achieve statistical significance. Even though the difference in the rate of anastomotic<br />

thrombosis (6 % in SGAP group vs 10 % in SGA group) was not statistically significant, patients in SGA group were prone to thrombosis<br />

at venous site. They were also more likely to require vein grafting and require take-back <strong>for</strong> anastomotic problems, specifically venous<br />

thrombosis. In this group, venous access proved a problem in number of cases even when a vein graft was not required: the external<br />

jugular vein was utilized in 13 cases and the cephalic in 3. Overall, patients in SGAP group had higher rate of utilization of internal mammary<br />

vessels <strong>for</strong> recipient site (100 % vs 66%), a statistically significant difference. To analyze requirements <strong>for</strong> second stage reconstruction<br />

separate analysis was carried out <strong>for</strong> staged bilateral or unilateral breast reconstruction. There was no difference between two<br />

groups with regards to a number of second stage operations, as well as number of procedures required to achieve optimal outcome<br />

at donor site or breast. We believe that our report highlights that SGAP and SGA flaps are very similar. However, SGAP flap appears to<br />

be superior in allowing utilization of internal mammary vessels <strong>for</strong> as recipients, allowing <strong>for</strong> better <strong>plan</strong>ned, smoother and more predictable<br />

operative course.<br />

Advanced Age as a Risk Factor <strong>for</strong> Free Tissue Transfer Breast Reconstructions: A Review of<br />

372 Operations<br />

Institution where the work was prepared: UCLA (University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Los Angeles), Los Angeles, CA, USA<br />

Maura Reinblatt, MD; Luis Vaca; Jaco Festekjian, MD; James Watson, MD; Andrew Da Lio, MD; Christopher Crisera,<br />

MD; University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Los Angeles<br />

BACKGROUND:<br />

Aging is an important risk factor <strong>for</strong> developing breast cancer. As the population ages, surgeons will encounter a growing proportion<br />

of elderly women requiring breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Because free tissue transfer breast reconstruction generally results<br />

in longer operative times and recovery periods, the applicability of microsurgical reconstruction in the aging patient needs further study.<br />

We set out to assess the risks of microvascular breast reconstruction with advancing age.<br />

METHODS:<br />

A prospectively maintained database was utilized to identify microvascular breast reconstructions per<strong>for</strong>med between 2002 and 2006.<br />

Patients were divided into four age groups: less than 50 years of age (Group 1), between 50 and 59 (Group 2), between 60 and 69 (Group<br />

3), and 70 years of age and above (Group 4). Comorbidities (hypothyroidism, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia,<br />

surgical history, body mass index), <strong>American</strong> Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) status, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were examined.<br />

Surgical complications including flap loss, thrombosis, hematoma, abdominal hernia, and fat necrosis were analyzed.<br />

RESULTS:<br />

A total of 372 free flaps were per<strong>for</strong>med on 295 patients, ranging from 24 to 75 (mean 51) years of age. The flap success rate was 99.2%,<br />

with 3 flap losses. 60% of the flaps per<strong>for</strong>med were free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and muscle-sparing<br />

free TRAM, 34% were deep inferior epigastric artery per<strong>for</strong>ator (DIEP), and 5% were superior gluteal artery per<strong>for</strong>ator (SGAP). The overall<br />

rate of surgical complications was 33%. The most common complication was fat necrosis (21%), followed by abdominal laxity or hernia<br />

(6%). Age was not predictive of any surgical complication. There was no significant difference in the risk of overall surgical complications,<br />

or each individual complication, among the various age groups. ASA designation was the only significant predictor of overall<br />

surgical morbidity (p=0.02), specifically associated with fat necrosis (p=0.001) and hematoma (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!