01.08.2019 Views

CPT International 02/2019

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SIMULATION<br />

Figure 3: Positions of the thermocouples in the real casting trials.<br />

Temperature [°C]<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

Standard deviaon TE1<br />

Standard deviaon TE2<br />

Standard deviaon TE3<br />

Standard deviaon TE4<br />

Standard deviaon TE5<br />

Simulaon TE1<br />

Simulaon TE2<br />

Simulaon TE3<br />

Simulaon TE4<br />

Simulaon TE5<br />

0<br />

350 550 750 950 1150 1350 1550 1750 1950 2150<br />

Time, s<br />

Figure 4: Comparison of measured temperature curves with the simulation results.<br />

Figure 5: Representation of the burning behavior of exothermic feeder sleeves: Left: Start of<br />

the exothermic reaction, Middle: Combustion of the exothermic feeder, Right: ‘Afterglow’ of<br />

the feeder material.<br />

Experimental investigations<br />

GTP Schäfer started by carrying out<br />

measurements of the thermo-physical<br />

properties in order to obtain data on<br />

exothermic feeder materials. Whereby a<br />

sample with a defined energy per time<br />

unit was heated and the material properties<br />

continuously determined. One<br />

difficulty during these measurements<br />

was the high level of dynamism caused<br />

by the exothermic reaction. As soon as<br />

the ignition temperature is reached, the<br />

material burns up autonomously – and<br />

no longer follows the temperature of<br />

the measurement system. So it was only<br />

possible to reliably determine the material<br />

properties in the unburnt state<br />

during these experiments. Therefore<br />

the combustion behavior and material<br />

properties during and after burning<br />

were initially inaccurate or unknown.<br />

So it was necessary to examine the<br />

burning behavior with more precision.<br />

For this purpose, an experimental setup<br />

similar to that in the German Foundrymen’s<br />

Association (VDG) Specification<br />

P81 on the testing of exothermic materials<br />

[2] was selected (Figure 1). Two test<br />

pieces (D = 50 mm, H = 50 mm) were<br />

made for the experiment using exothermic<br />

material, and one was placed on<br />

top of the other. The lower test piece<br />

was ignited and the burning behavior<br />

of the two samples investigated. This<br />

setup allowed good observation and<br />

understanding of the progress of the<br />

combustion process. Then the chronological<br />

and spatial course of the burning<br />

behavior was compared with the simulation<br />

model (Figure 2).<br />

Real casting trials in furan sand<br />

molds were then carried out after the<br />

investigation of the burning behavior<br />

of the test bodies. The effort required<br />

for these experiments turned out to be<br />

considerably greater than anticipated.<br />

But it was shown that the burning<br />

behavior of feeders within sand molds<br />

differs substantially from that in ambient<br />

air. This difference can be explained<br />

by the fact that only a limited amount<br />

of oxygen is available for the exothermic<br />

material within a sand mold. During<br />

the casting experiments, exothermic<br />

feeder sleeve in a furan sand mold were<br />

filled with melt and the temperature<br />

curves were determined. For this purpose,<br />

separate thermocouples were<br />

positioned in the exothermic material,<br />

the molding sand, and the melt in order<br />

to determine the temperature changes.<br />

One thermocouple was placed within<br />

the melt in the feeder. Two more were<br />

located in the sleeve, and two in the<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!