18.02.2020 Views

Smart Industry 1/2020

Smart Industry 1/2020 - The IoT Business Magazine - powered by Avnet Silica

Smart Industry 1/2020 - The IoT Business Magazine - powered by Avnet Silica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Editorial<br />

Europe Takes<br />

the Lead<br />

Tim Cole<br />

is the editor of <strong>Smart</strong><br />

<strong>Industry</strong> – the IoT Business<br />

Magazine. His latest book,<br />

Wild Wild West – What<br />

the History of the American<br />

Wild West Teaches Us<br />

About the Future of the<br />

Digital Society is published<br />

in German by Vahlen/Beck.<br />

The Internet needs fixing, there’s no<br />

doubt about it, but whose job is it?<br />

Much can be left to the IT industry itself,<br />

which has shown itself quite competent<br />

in the past to self-regulate, standardize, and<br />

hold itself to high moral standards.<br />

Unfortunately, that is not enough. The invisible<br />

hand of the market needs help from national<br />

and international legislators. In the old Wild<br />

West, they would have called it Law ‘n’ Order.<br />

The logical body to regulate a transnational<br />

network like the Internet, you might think, is<br />

the United Nations but, given the diversity of<br />

economic and political systems with their competing<br />

and, more often, conflicting goals and<br />

ethics, that hardly seems likely. So, who else?<br />

The Internet was born in the United States and<br />

for decades US authorities exercised a selfassumed<br />

authority in cyberspace. Then regulation<br />

became the watchword – of conservatives,<br />

at least – and the current administration<br />

is more likely to loosen than tighten things like<br />

antitrust regulation, much less put Big Tech<br />

on a leash for things like hate speech, child<br />

pornography, or unfair business practices. The<br />

other big player, China, is more interested in<br />

putting the Internet under the control of party<br />

apparatchiks, which is unacceptable to Western<br />

liberal democracies.<br />

Only one remains: Europe. The third-largest<br />

economic bloc in the world is powerful enough<br />

to enforce rules and regulations on its own<br />

turf and influential enough to persuade other<br />

countries to follow their lead.<br />

More important, Europeans appear to be the<br />

only ones willing to tackle the many problems<br />

in the digital realm. In 2016, the European<br />

Commission fined Google $5 billion for abusing<br />

its mobile operating system to ensure the<br />

popularity of Google apps and services over<br />

others. Last year, the EU hit Google again for<br />

$1.6 billion for abusing its market dominance<br />

by imposing a number of restrictive clauses<br />

in contracts with third-party websites which<br />

prevented Google’s rivals from placing their<br />

search adverts on these websites. European<br />

authorities also have forced the likes of Facebook<br />

and Twitter to remove extremist or sexist<br />

content – or face the consequences. And, in<br />

2017, Amazon was ordered to pay the EU $294<br />

million in unpaid taxes.<br />

Europe, it seems, is the only authority in the<br />

world willing to take a hard line. Add to that<br />

the unfairly criticized General Data Protection<br />

Regulation (GDPR), which turns out to be the<br />

only strong attempt by any national regulation<br />

system to solve the problem of data ownership.<br />

California is reputedly considering introducing<br />

its own legislation following the lines of<br />

Europe’s new data law.<br />

The European Union, it seems, is just getting<br />

warmed up. In June 2019, the new EU Cybersecurity<br />

Act came into effect. Once more, critics<br />

were quick to denounce undue government<br />

meddling and overregulation, but any serious<br />

student of the new legislation will have to admit<br />

that, for the very first time, manufacturers<br />

have a standardized framework to guide them<br />

in implementing security across their products<br />

and proving to their customers that they have<br />

done so.<br />

In fact, the act will not make life miserable for<br />

ICT product manufacturers, but instead make<br />

it easier. Companies doing business in the EU<br />

will only have to certify their ICT products, processes,<br />

and services once to see their certificates<br />

recognized across all of Europe.<br />

A better way to understand what is going on<br />

is to consider what happens when buying a<br />

fridge. For years there has been a universally<br />

accepted energy-efficiency scale (A+++ down<br />

to G) that lets buyers compare products from<br />

many manufacturers. The EU wants to make<br />

this available also with security.<br />

Once again, it can be expected that the EU cybersecurity<br />

act will lead the rest of the world,<br />

triggering similar legislation in the US and Asia,<br />

moving security standards and certification<br />

methods across borders and applications.<br />

After all, somebody has to do it!<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!