30.03.2020 Views

Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100

CHAPTER 6

70–80% success in performing total colonoscopy, presumably

because some examinations were intolerable. If some degree

of ‘conscious sedation’ is used (typically equivalent in effect to

2–3 glasses of wine or beer), the patient is more likely to find the

examination tolerable, even enjoyable, or to have amnesia for it.

The endoscopist can perhaps be more thorough in the knowledge

that the patient is comfortable, and is also more likely to achieve

total colonoscopy in a shorter time. However, with heavy sedation

endoscopists can get away with ham-handed forcibly looping

technique—a bad investment in the long term, less likely to

achieve complete examinations, more likely to result in complications

and more expensive in instrument repair bills. It is often

said that it is dangerous to sedate, because the safety factor of

pain is removed; this is not strictly true, providing that the endoscopist

raises his own threshold of awareness as the patient’s

pain threshold is raised, responding to restlessness or changes of

facial expression as a warning that tissues and attachments are

being overstretched.

Most endoscopists use a balanced approach to sedation that

will be affected by many factors, including personal experience

and the individual patient’s attitude. A relaxed patient with a

short colon having a limited examination rarely needs sedation,

but an anxious patient with a tortuous colon, severe diverticular

disease, or a bad previous experience needs some protection. A

very few patients have such a morbid fear of colonoscopy, such

a low pain threshold or a known ‘difficult’ colon that it is justified

to resort to light general anesthesia. General anesthesia is

only likely to be hazardous when employed by an inexperienced

colonoscopist, able to use brutal technique because the anesthetized

patient cannot protest. However, even experienced

endoscopists are more likely to ‘push the limits’ and tend to

become more mechanistic when the patient is anesthetized and

‘out of it’.

Nitrous oxide inhalation

Fig. 6.1–Nitrous oxide/oxygen

mixture is breathed through a

mouthpiece.

Nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation can be a useful ‘half-way house’

between no sedation and conventional intravenous sedation.

The 50·:·50 nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture is self-administered by

the patient, inhaling from a small cylinder fitted with a demand

valve. Breathing the gas through a small single-use mouthpiece

(Fig. 6.1) avoids the difficulties that can be experienced in getting

a good fit with a face mask, and also the phobia that some

patients feel for masks. Because of the possible teratogenicity of

passively inhaled nitrous oxide to females of child-bearing age,

a gas-scavenging system must be in place before routine use, but

may be unnecessary for occasional usage.

The patient is shown how to inhale, then ‘prebreathes’ for a

minute or so as the endoscopist prepares to start the procedure,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!