30.03.2020 Views

Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182

CHAPTER 7

process. Snaring has the advantage over hot-biopsy of squeezing

the polyp base, so reducing the area and depth of electrocoagulation

damage to the remaining mucosa and underlying blood vessels.

Some endoscopists go further and advocate ‘cold snaring’

without electrocoagulation, particularly in the proximal colon,

physically pulling through the base of the small snared polyp in

order to avoid any risk of heat ulceration and delayed bleeds.

Snaring very small polyps can be technically difficult and the specimens

are not infrequently lost. Use of the filtered suction trap for retrieval

is a significant improvement over the older mucus aspiration

trap (designed for bronchoscopy or neonatal care), because

each specimen is trapped in a separate numbered compartment

and the incorporated filter prevents specimen loss even if excess

fluid has to be aspirated. Putting a gauze in the suction line is

cheaper for single polyps.

‘Hot biopsy’

(a)

(b)

(c)

Fig. 7.29 (a) Hot biopsy forceps

grasp the small polyp and pull

up… (b)…then coagulate until

there is ‘snow on Mount Fuji’…

(c)…pull off the biopsy sample,

leaving the coagulated polyp

base.

Hot biopsy forceps are a quick and effective way of destroying

the smallest (1–4·mm) polyps (Fig. 7.29a), in spite of some bad

press due to occasional bleeding complications. They have the

particular virtue of yielding over 95% of interpretable histology—compared

with the frequent specimen losses after snaring.

Histology is potentially important in managing a patient

because the total number of adenomas is the most important

predictor offuture risk of neoplasm, so should influence advice

on follow-up (see below). The hot biopsy forceps are only different

from conventional diagnostic forceps in having a plastic insulation

outer sheath and a handle with electrical connection to

the electrosurgical unit, the circuit connecting back via a patient

plate, just as for polypectomy. The same low-power ‘coag’ setting

(15–25·W or equivalent) is used as for snaring a small polyp. The

specimen taken (often only 10–20% of the whole polyp) is protected

from current flow within the forceps jaws, so is unheated

(unless by thermal conduction resulting from over-lengthy

current application). By contrast, provided that the technique

is properly performed, within 1–2 seconds there is intense local

heating of the tissues and blood supply beneath, resulting in

surprisingly dramatic but superficial ulceration—which heals

over the next two weeks.

Safe hot biopsy depends on localizing the heating effect by careful

attention to details of technique:

1–Select only a suitably small polyp—and don’t be too proud to

abandon hot biopsy and change to (mini-) snaring if the polyp

proves to be bigger than expected.

2–Only the apex of the small polyp is grasped in the jaws of the hotbiopsy

forceps (Fig. 7.29b), deliberately not forcing them into the

colon surface below, as is normal in taking a mucosal biopsy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!