30.03.2020 Views

Practical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THERAPEUTIC COLONOSCOPY 187

peritoneal (below the peritoneal reflexion) and may sometimes

be better removed by local proctological techniques, which often

produce a single large specimen for optimum histology—rather

than the chaos of fragments resulting from endoscopic piecemeal

snaring. Anesthesia allows anal dilation and a two-handed

approach for injection and scissor-excision, with the potential to

ligature or suture bleeding points if necessary. A failed endoscopic

attempt to remove such rectal polyps forms scar tissue,

which hinders submucosal epinephrine injection and excision

by the proctologist, so the endoscopist’s decision to refer should

be made on the basis of visual assessment alone. Only 1·:·200·000

epinephrine solution is used in the rectum (compared with 1·:

·10·000 solution in the colon) because very large volumes may

be needed and there is risk of communication to the systemic

circulation, and danger of serious cardiac dysrhythmias. Sessile

polyps more than 12·cm above the anal margin can alternatively

be reached with a Buess operating sigmoidoscope (transanal

microsurgery or TEMS), where this is available, but will more

often be managed by the flexible endoscopist using injection and

piecemeal removal with argon plasma coagulation.

Smaller rectal polyps close to the anal canal can be snared in retroversion

after local anesthetic injection, unless the polyp is very small

and quick to snare (perhaps by ‘cold-snaring’). The distal 3–5·cm

of the rectal ampulla is otherwise difficult to visualize properly

and is also richly supplied with sensory nerves, a heat burn causing

the same pain as it would on exterior skin.

Large stalked polyps

The ‘large’ size of a polyp is sometimes an illusion because the

visual judgment of size is made relative to the diameter of the

colon lumen. Proximal colon and cecal polyps thus tend to be

larger than they look at first sight. In the narrowed lumen of diverticular

disease, polyps that appear large may prove on snaring to

be significantly smaller.

In snaring a large stalk, extra electrocoagulation is needed to

minimize the increased chance of bleeding from the relatively

large plexus of stalk vessels, and extra care (and time) should be

taken to optimize things before starting:

1– Check that an epinephrine-filled injection cannula can be rapidly

available in case of bleeding, and probably a clipping device and

nylon EndoLoop® as well.

2–Palpate and move the stalk around using the closed snare to

judge its diameter, length and mobility.

3–Get the best view possible; if necessary rotate the endoscope or

change patient position (Figs 7.21 and 7.37).

4 –Place the snare optimally on the narrowest part of the stalk to ensure

maximal current density.

(a)

(b)

Fig. 7.37 (a) Bad view of a polyp?

(b) Change the patient’s position

to let gravityhelp.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!