19.12.2012 Views

1 Chapter 1. Introduction: status and definition of compounding ...

1 Chapter 1. Introduction: status and definition of compounding ...

1 Chapter 1. Introduction: status and definition of compounding ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2.2.1 Lexical <strong>and</strong> grammatical variability<br />

Claiming (as the title <strong>of</strong> the present chapter suggests) that compounds can be viewed <strong>and</strong><br />

also studied as idiomatic expressions, or perhaps even as idioms proper (?), calls for an<br />

explanation what we mean by these.<br />

Speaking <strong>of</strong> ‗idiomatic expressions‘ I have in mind multiword chunks consisting <strong>of</strong><br />

constituents which are bound together lexically <strong>and</strong> syntactically. These constituents need not<br />

necessarily be bound absolutely, although this kind <strong>of</strong> invariability is believed to be a significant<br />

feature <strong>of</strong> typical idioms, e.g., red herring, cook one‟s goose. However, there are combinations<br />

in which one constituent (called a ‗collocate‘) can be replaced, cf. chequered history/career;<br />

seize/grasp the nettle. Moreover, certain degrees <strong>of</strong> variance are permitted within grammatical<br />

categories, whereas syntactic variance (sometimes referred to as syntactic productivity) is hardly<br />

possible, e.g., It speaks/spoke volumes – *volumes are/were spoken; He spilled the beans – *The<br />

beans were spilled (unless we have in mind the literal meaning). For reasons <strong>of</strong> space, intricacies<br />

concerning possibilities <strong>of</strong> variance in genuine idioms cannot be commented upon 3 ; fortunately,<br />

these will not affect the following discussion on compounds. Nevertheless, even if readers may<br />

judge the expression spill the beans as an idiom but chequered history as a collocation (due to<br />

the fact <strong>of</strong> the replaceable ‗collocate‘ <strong>and</strong> the fixed ‗base‘ in the latter case), it is still a delicate<br />

matter to determine the points at which a multiword expression is called a ‗collocation‘ rather<br />

than an ‗idiom‘, to say nothing <strong>of</strong> a boundary between these two on the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> so-called<br />

‗free combination‘ (practically ‗syntactic string‘) on the other h<strong>and</strong>, e.g., a small desk, open the<br />

door (to be compared to a writing desk; answer the door). One reason is that we do not have any<br />

means <strong>of</strong> measuring the degrees on one or the other scale. The other reason is that the feature <strong>of</strong><br />

variance, or variability, is by itself a complex phenomenon, involving both grammar <strong>and</strong> lexis.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!