26.06.2020 Views

The Heart of Bexar County

Restoration of the Bexar County Courthouse. By Nelson and Tracy Wolff. Published by HPN Books a division of Ledge Media © 2020

Restoration of the Bexar County Courthouse. By Nelson and Tracy Wolff. Published by HPN Books a division of Ledge Media © 2020

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Both designs were ill conceived, misguided,<br />

and architecturally inappropriate. Both violated<br />

the height, material and the historical character<br />

<strong>of</strong> the courthouse.<br />

Over the years, interior modifications also did<br />

significant harm to historic features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

courthouse. Ornate ceilings were covered up<br />

with dropped ceiling tiles. Floors were covered<br />

with asbestos tiles. Large arch windows were<br />

partially covered over. In 1967, the original<br />

1897 30-foot high courtroom was divided in half<br />

when a floor was added and another courtroom<br />

was built above it.<br />

In addition to the remodeling mistakes, the<br />

electrical, air conditioning and plumbing<br />

systems were out <strong>of</strong> date and the exterior walls<br />

and balconies were water damaged and<br />

crumbling. Urban pollution did great harm and<br />

nasty pigeon droppings caused additional<br />

damage. When mixed with rain, it became acid<br />

and ate away at the sandstone. Guano from bats<br />

had accumulated in the towers on both ends <strong>of</strong><br />

the courthouse. <strong>The</strong> basement was damp<br />

because <strong>of</strong> continuous rainwater that flowed<br />

into the basement.<br />

With misguided additions, poor remodeling<br />

and neglect, the courthouse was in bad shape.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1998 National Trust annual list <strong>of</strong> most<br />

endangered historic resources included the<br />

<strong>Bexar</strong> <strong>County</strong> Courthouse, along with other<br />

historic courthouses throughout Texas.<br />

Texas Governor George W. Bush, during his<br />

campaign for re-election in 1998, promised he<br />

would advocate for funding to restore Texas’<br />

historic courthouses. He was re-elected and<br />

fulfilled his promise by setting up a $50 million<br />

fund to be administered by the Texas Historical<br />

Commission. <strong>The</strong>y set up a policy that required<br />

local matching funds and a master plan in order<br />

to be eligible for funding.<br />

In response to the Texas Historical<br />

Commission, <strong>Bexar</strong> <strong>County</strong> Judge Cyndi Krier<br />

convinced the Commissioners Court in 1998 to<br />

do an assessment <strong>of</strong> the courthouse and then<br />

prepare a courthouse master plan. <strong>The</strong> Court<br />

contracted with 3D/International and they hired<br />

Betty Bueche to do the assessment and develop<br />

the master plan. At the time, Betty was working<br />

in Denver where she had developed a master<br />

plan to restore the Colorado Brown Stone<br />

historic 1890s Social Club.<br />

A San Antonio native, Betty has an<br />

undergraduate degree in fine art and biology<br />

from Incarnate Word College and a Master<br />

<strong>of</strong> Architecture degree from UT Austin. She<br />

had also been a Conservation Society member<br />

since 1977.<br />

Two years later in January 2000, she<br />

presented the historic preservation plan to the<br />

Commissioners Court. <strong>The</strong> plan turned out to<br />

be bit more than what the Commissioners Court<br />

bargained for. It was estimated to cost as much<br />

as $59 million.<br />

It was expensive because <strong>of</strong> the damage and<br />

neglect <strong>of</strong> the building, as well as misguided<br />

remodeling projects over the years. Three million<br />

people a year come through the courthouse<br />

creating a lot <strong>of</strong> wear and tear.<br />

<strong>The</strong> master plan provided for the restoration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the exterior, ten historic courtrooms and four<br />

corridors that span the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

courthouse. It also called for new elevators, a<br />

new air-conditioning system, electrical and<br />

plumbing repairs and upgrading technology.<br />

Two other aspects <strong>of</strong> the plan proved to be<br />

controversial. One called for the restoration <strong>of</strong><br />

the original two-story courtroom that had been<br />

sliced in two in 1967 when a floor was added to<br />

accommodate the 285th District courtroom.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second proposal was even more<br />

controversial. <strong>The</strong> plan provided options<br />

for dealing with the 1963 and 1972 additions<br />

to the courthouse that failed to match the<br />

building’s original architecture. One option<br />

was to add windows, another to create a<br />

fake façade, and the best was to remove the<br />

two additions. But no one on the court was<br />

willing to undertake that task or even seriously<br />

discuss it.<br />

But there was one element <strong>of</strong> the plan that<br />

clearly needed to begin as soon as possible—the<br />

exterior <strong>of</strong> the courthouse was in sad shape.<br />

Pieces <strong>of</strong> the tiled turrets and towers had<br />

actually fallen <strong>of</strong>f. Scaffolding was installed to<br />

protect the public from further fallen pieces<br />

<strong>of</strong> stone.<br />

Even though there were reservations about<br />

the plan, the Commissioners Court accepted the<br />

master plan, forwarded it to the Historical<br />

Commission, and applied for a grant to restore<br />

the exterior walls. This is where Nelson and I<br />

came into the picture.<br />

2 2 F T H E H E A R T O F B E X A R C O U N T Y

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!