24.12.2012 Views

2005 Annual Report Julius Baer Holding Ltd. - GAM Holding AG

2005 Annual Report Julius Baer Holding Ltd. - GAM Holding AG

2005 Annual Report Julius Baer Holding Ltd. - GAM Holding AG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes<br />

15 February 2006. These consolidated financial statements<br />

will be presented for approval at the <strong>Annual</strong><br />

General Meeting on 12 April 2006.<br />

Changes in accounting policies and comparability<br />

The Group applied all new and revised IFRS for the<br />

first time in <strong>2005</strong>. Adoption of these new and revised<br />

IFRS resulted in the following changes in the accounting<br />

policies of the Group:<br />

IFRS 2 – Share-based Payment<br />

IFRS 2, Share-based Payment, prescribes the<br />

accounting for share-based payments to employees<br />

and other parties. When such payments are made to<br />

employees in the form of shares or share options, the<br />

fair value of these payments at the grant date must<br />

be recognized as compensation expense. Sharebased<br />

payments that are subject to a vesting period<br />

must be expensed using the straight-line method over<br />

the vesting period. Granted options are recognized in<br />

the balance sheet as a liability at fair value until they<br />

are exercised. The new standard is effective for financial<br />

years beginning on or after 1 January <strong>2005</strong>. It<br />

applies only to share-based payments granted after<br />

7 November 2002 that have not yet vested as of<br />

1 January <strong>2005</strong>. It also applies to liabilities arising<br />

from share-based payments that exist at the effective<br />

date.<br />

The change in accounting due to the new standard<br />

IFRS 2 resulted in restatement of the 2004 figures in<br />

the <strong>2005</strong> financial year. This had the following consequences:<br />

Consolidated shareholders’ equity (excluding minority<br />

interest) declined by a net CHF 22.7 million as of<br />

1 January 2004, with the following changes taking<br />

place among the individual positions within shareholders’<br />

equity:<br />

78 JULIUS BAER GROUP<br />

– The treasury shares, which are deducted from<br />

shareholders’ equity, increased by CHF 11.2 million<br />

as of 1 January 2004.<br />

– The capital reserve increased by CHF 99.8 million<br />

as of 1 January 2004.<br />

– The retained earnings declined by CHF 105.1 million<br />

as of 1 January 2004.<br />

The liabilities increased by CHF 9.3 million as of<br />

1 January 2004.<br />

Personnel expenses increased by CHF 11.2 million for<br />

the 2004 financial year.<br />

IFRS 3 – Business Combinations<br />

IFRS 3 requires that all business combinations be<br />

accounted for using the purchase method. The pooling-of-interests<br />

method is no longer permitted. The<br />

key change within scope of the new standard is that<br />

existing goodwill can no longer be amortized over an<br />

estimated useful life, but must instead be tested for<br />

impairment annually. Intangible assets may be<br />

treated as having an indefinite useful life if supported<br />

by the facts and circumstances. These intangibles are<br />

not amortized, but tested for impairment periodically.<br />

The change in accounting due to the new standard<br />

IFRS 3 does not result in any restatement of the<br />

2004 figures in the <strong>2005</strong> financial year.<br />

Revised IAS 32 and IAS 39 – Financial Instruments<br />

In December 2003, the International Accounting<br />

Standards Board (IASB) issued the revised versions of<br />

IAS 32 and IAS 39. Both standards are effective for<br />

financial years beginning on or after 1 January <strong>2005</strong>.<br />

These two standards provide comprehensive guidelines<br />

for the recognition, measurement, presentation<br />

and disclosure of financial instruments. The standards<br />

must be applied retrospectively. Hence, the<br />

comparison data for 2004 provided in the <strong>2005</strong> financial<br />

statements had to be restated accordingly, as if<br />

the revised standards had always been in force.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!