Newslink March
Motor Schools Association of Great Britain; driver training and testing
Motor Schools Association of Great Britain; driver training and testing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For all the latest news, see www.msagb.com<br />
Your responses ... How ADIs<br />
responded to the blog ...<br />
The DVSA is looking at changes to its<br />
fixed estate test centres<br />
options of where candidates can sit their<br />
tests.<br />
MSA GB says: Flexibility in delivery to<br />
take into account changing circumstances<br />
is always welcome but it can’t come at<br />
the expense of stability. We can see the<br />
attraction for the DVSA of dispensing<br />
with the fixed estate but it does throw<br />
up a number of problems: Where do<br />
pupils/trainers wait? What facilities are<br />
available to candidates?<br />
Changes to the assessment process for<br />
ORDIT<br />
LR: We will be increasing the number<br />
of examiners who can do Official Register<br />
of Driving Instructor Trainer (ORDIT)<br />
assessments for both new applicants and<br />
current members whose registrations<br />
have lapsed.<br />
We will also be updating the<br />
assessment process to continue work to<br />
raise professional standards and ensure<br />
learner drivers (and instructors) have<br />
access to the highest quality tuition<br />
possible.<br />
MSA GB says: ORDIT has felt unfit for<br />
purpose for some time. We would<br />
welcome positive changes to this scheme.<br />
Continued on page 8<br />
On ORDIT...<br />
...To be honest it would be a much<br />
more satisfactory if DVSA steps away<br />
from ORDIT altogether. DVSA could<br />
then concentrate on L tests.<br />
ORDIT, being totally independent,<br />
could focus on instructor training and<br />
testing, ie, ORDIT training a<br />
requirement for PDI from the outset,<br />
testing over the period of the pink<br />
licence by ORDIT trainer not associated<br />
with the sponsoring school.<br />
For existing ADIs, proof of attending<br />
ORDIT training and CPD in order to<br />
remain on the register.<br />
On waiting times...<br />
...Put a temporary ban on all private<br />
non-dual controlled cars taking the<br />
category B test. This way you’ll avoid<br />
those people who turn up but are not<br />
test ready and also, as you have no<br />
dual controls, put examiners at an<br />
unnecessary risk.<br />
If an ADI turns up, say, three times<br />
in a set period and it’s clear that all the<br />
pupils were not test-ready, then that<br />
ADI is banned from taking pupils to<br />
test for 21 days<br />
It’s a win-win for everybody...<br />
...Waiting times for driving tests in<br />
most major cities and large towns are<br />
still over six months. I don’t see any<br />
improvements. Some test centres in<br />
rural areas with very low populations<br />
have a short waiting time such as 8-12<br />
weeks which is helping to bring the<br />
average down but it’s very misleading.<br />
There is a massive black market for<br />
short notice tests in the big cities and<br />
towns which the DVSA can’t control.<br />
The DVSA made some efforts a while<br />
back after being exposed by the BBC<br />
news - but why did it have to take<br />
exposure from the BBC for them to act?<br />
They knew about the black market<br />
tests after the lockdowns.<br />
The DVSA talks a good game but I’m<br />
sorry, not enough is being done to stop<br />
the black market driving tests. Sort the<br />
root cause out – waiting times for<br />
driving tests and the black market will<br />
go away as well!<br />
... How about opening test centres<br />
that were closed in 2008 due to the<br />
stupid EU rules for motorbike<br />
emergency stop. Our local town<br />
Wellingborough test centre closed after<br />
decades of having one. Now we have<br />
one located at an elderly day care<br />
centre for two measly days a week with<br />
two examiners... oh, and a five-month<br />
waiting list.<br />
Return it to a proper five days a<br />
week/ four examiners test centre like it<br />
used to be PLEASE!!<br />
...To be entirely frank, the DVSA<br />
seems less than honest about waiting<br />
times. It claims a reduction of ‘average’<br />
waiting times but it is nothing more<br />
than smoke and mirrors. Where is the<br />
proof of an actual reduction? We don’t<br />
see one.<br />
It makes no sense to keep taking on<br />
more and more PDIs; increasing the<br />
number of ADIs gets more learners into<br />
the system, but at a time when tests<br />
they need are rarer than unicorns.<br />
Until such time as the DVSA is on<br />
top of the waiting list properly, this<br />
situation won’t improve.<br />
...Here’s an idea: Stop failing good<br />
drivers for silly things to keep the<br />
examiners’ pass rates within 10% of<br />
the centre average.<br />
Maybe go easier on those examiners<br />
who flag up anomalies on your system<br />
of KPIs and they won’t feel the need to<br />
fail people unnecessarily.<br />
...Can you not make it that to book a<br />
test, the candidate must quote an ADI<br />
number? No number, no test.<br />
More ADIs’ thoughts on pg 8<br />
NEWSLINK n MARCH 2023 07