Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
98<br />
of the engine itself). A longer time scale would characterize the collapsars where the disk is<br />
continually fed by stellar collapse. Perhaps the long complex bursts (20 s mean) are due to<br />
collapsars and the short bursts are merging compact objects.<br />
For an accretion rate of 0.1 M ⊙ s −1 , the energy dissipated, mostly in neutrinos, is 1.8×10 53<br />
F erg/s where F is 0.06 for Schwarzschild geometry (perhaps appropriate for merging compact<br />
objects) and 0.4 for extreme Kerr geometry (perhaps appropriate for collapsars). Coupled<br />
with their short time scale this implies that merging compact objects may give bursts of much<br />
less total energy than collapsars, but the efficiency for getting the jet out of a collapsar may<br />
modulate this considerably (see below). In all models, a portion of the energy goes into MHD<br />
instabilities in the disk that may result in an energetic wind, or perhaps the rotational energy<br />
of the black hole is tapped as in some models for AGN. But the simplest physical solution for<br />
ejecting relativistic matter, if it works, is neutrino annihilation along the rotational axis of the<br />
hole (Woosley 1993). The efficiency for this is uncertain, but numerical simulations (see the<br />
paper by Ruffert, these proceedings) suggest an efficiency for converting neutrino luminosity<br />
into pair fireball energy of ∼1%. Thus one has a total energy for black holes merging with<br />
neutron stars of order 10 50 erg (Ruffert et al. 1997) and a total energy for collapsars that<br />
might approach 10 52 erg.<br />
The chief uncertainty in all these models—aside from exactly how the relativistic matter<br />
reconverts its streaming energy into gamma-rays—is the baryon loading. One expects this<br />
to be relatively small in neutron star and black hole mergers, but still perhaps more than<br />
10 −5 M ⊙, depending upon the mingling of the wind from the disk, residual matter from the<br />
merger, and the relativistic outflow. Detailed calculations remain to be done.<br />
The problem is much more severe in the collapsar model where the jet that is formed has<br />
to penetrate the overlying star—or what is left of it—a little like making the γ-ray burst at<br />
the center of the sun. Still 10 52 erg is a lot of energy and we also expect that the jet from<br />
collapsar models might be tightly beamed. This is initially the case because the disk makes a<br />
transition from very thick (geometrically) to thin at the point where neutrino losses start to<br />
occur on an accretion time scale. This happens at a definite radius, ∼100 km, because of the<br />
T 9 dependence of the neutrino rates (Bob Popham, private communication). Calculations in<br />
progress by Müller and colleagues at the MPA will show how effective this jet is at tunneling<br />
thru the star. Our own recent 2D simulations suggest a solid angle of only about 1% for<br />
the jet. A lot of energy gets used up ejecting all the mass above about 45 degrees from the<br />
equator. A supernova is one consequence; a collapsar is not a “failed supernova” after all, but<br />
this mass ejection at large angles is non-relativistic. Along the axis the jet clears a path for<br />
more energetic matter to follow, and since the burst continues for many jet-stellar crossing<br />
times, Γ rises. Only ∼0.01 M ⊙ initially lies in the path of the jet for the expected small<br />
opening angle.<br />
The energy of the ejecta and presumably the hardness of the transient that is seen thereafter<br />
thus depends upon viewing angle. Along the axis, high Γ will overtake low Γ material<br />
before the observable event actually commences. The start of the burst occurs when the jet<br />
sweeps up 1/Γ times its rest mass, or about 10 −7 M ⊙. This happens after the jet has gone<br />
about 10 15 cm and interacted with the stellar wind ejected prior to the explosion (about<br />
10 −5 M ⊙ y −1 assumed).<br />
In summary we expect about 10 50 erg, ∼ < 0.1% of the total energy dissipated in the disk,<br />
to go into a jet with Γ ∼ > 100 and an opening angle of about 10 degrees. The event rate could<br />
be 10 −4 to 10 −3 y −1 per bright galaxy.<br />
Below we show pictures of our first 2D calculation of rotating stellar collapse about 10 s