Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
48<br />
Indirect information can be obtained from the light curves and the spectra leading, however,<br />
to an “inverse” problem as far as theoretical interpretations are concerned.<br />
Theoretical Classification<br />
The theoretical classification of supernovae is usually done according to the suspected progenitor<br />
stars and the explosion mechanism, and it dates back to a classic paper of Fred Hoyle and<br />
Willy Fowler in 1960 [4]. Based on very few observational facts available at that time, they<br />
postulated that Type II supernovae are the consequence of an implosion of non-degenerate<br />
stars, whereas Type I’s are the result of the ignition of nuclear fuel in degenerate stars, and<br />
today this is still believed to be true in general, if “Type I’s” are substituted by “Type Ia’s”.<br />
Figure 1: Theoretical classification scheme of supernovae according to their progenitors.<br />
To be more specific, the present theoretical classification schemes based on progenitor<br />
properties and the energetics of the explosion are given in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. It is<br />
now generally believed that Type II and Ib.c supernovae stem from collapsing massive stars<br />
with and without hydrogen envelopes, respectively, and that SN Ia originate from explosions<br />
of white dwarfs, although the way to explosion (accretion vs. merging of two white dwarfs) as<br />
well as the mass of the white dwarf (Chandrasekhar vs. sub-Chandrasekhar mass) just prior<br />
to the explosion are still heavily disputed (see Ref. [5] and references therein).<br />
The classification with respect to the energetics is even more complex, and a variety of<br />
possible models is available with no unique and well accepted answer. For example, in the<br />
case of thermonuclear explosions, it is not even clear what the mode of propagation of the<br />
burning front is, and observations supply poor constraints only. A (fast) deflagration wave<br />
in a Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf can explain the spectra and light curves of Type Ia’s,<br />
but so can deflagrations changing into detonations at low densities with or without pulsations<br />
(so-called delayed detonations), or even pure detonations in stars with low enough densities