Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36<br />
Measurements of Low Energy Nuclear Cross Sections<br />
M. Junker (for the LUNA Collaboration)<br />
Laboratori Nazionali Gran Sasso, Assergi (AQ), Italy<br />
and Institut für Experimentalphysik III, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany<br />
The nuclear reactions of the pp-chain play a key role in the understanding of energy production,<br />
nucleosynthesis and neutrino emission of the elements in stars and especially in our<br />
sun [1]. A comparison of the observed solar neutrino fluxes measured by the experiments<br />
GALLEX/SAGE, HOMESTAKE and KAMIOKANDE provides to date no unique picture<br />
of the microscopic processes in the sun [2]. A solution of this so called “solar neutrino puzzle”<br />
can possibly be found in the areas of neutrino physics, solar physics (models) or nuclear<br />
physics. In view of the important conclusions on non-standard physics, which might be derived<br />
from the results of the present and future solar neutrino experiments, it is essential to<br />
determine the neutrino source power of the sun more reliably.<br />
Due to the Coulomb Barrier involved in the nuclear fusion reactions, the cross section<br />
of a nuclear reaction drops nearly exponentially at energies which are lower than the<br />
Coulomb Barrier, leading to a low-energy limit of the feasible cross section measurements<br />
in a laboratory at the earth surface. Since this energy limit is far above the thermal energy<br />
region of the sun, the high energy data have to be extrapolated down to the energy<br />
region of interest transforming the exponentially dropping cross section σ(E) to the<br />
astrophysical S-factor S(E) = σ(E)E exp(2π η), with the Sommerfeld parameter given by<br />
2π η = 31.29Z1 Z2(µ/E) 1/2 [1]. The quantities Z1 and Z2 are the nuclear charges of the interacting<br />
particles in the entrance channel, µ is the reduced mass (in units of amu), and E<br />
is the center-of-mass energy (in units of keV). In case of a non resonant reaction S(E) may<br />
then be parameterized by the polynomial S(E) = S(0) + S ′ (0)E + 0.5S ′′ (0)E 2 .<br />
As usual in physics, extrapolation of data into the “unknown” can lead onto “icy ground”.<br />
Although experimental techniques have improved over the years to extend cross section measurements<br />
to lower energies, it has not yet been possible to perform measurements within the<br />
thermal energy region in stars.<br />
For nuclear reactions studied in the laboratory, the target nuclei and the projectiles are<br />
usually in the form of neutral atoms/molecules and ions, respectively. The electron clouds<br />
surrounding the interacting nuclides act as a screening potential: the projectile effectively sees<br />
a reduced Coulomb barrier. This leads to a higher cross section, σs(E), than would be the<br />
case for bare nuclei, σb(E), with an exponential enhancement factor flab(E) = σs(E)/σb(E) ≃<br />
exp(πη Ue/E) [3, 4] where Ue is the electron-screening potential energy (e.g. Ue ≃ Z1·Z2·e 2 /Ra<br />
approximately, with Ra an atomic radius). For a stellar plasma the value of σb(E) must be<br />
known because the screening in the plasma can be quite different from that in laboratory studies<br />
[5], and σb(E) must be explicitly included in each situation. Thus, a good understanding<br />
of electron-screening effects is needed to arrive at reliable σb(E) data at low energies. Lowenergy<br />
studies of several fusion reactions involving light nuclides showed [6, 7, 8] indeed the<br />
exponential enhancement of the cross section at low energies. The observed enhancement<br />
(i.e. the value of Ue) was in all cases close to or higher than the adiabatic limit derived from<br />
atomic-physics models. An exception are the 3 He+ 3 He data of Krauss et al. [10], which<br />
show apparently no electron screening down to E=25 keV, although the effects of electron<br />
screening should have enhanced the data at 25 keV by about a factor 1.2 for the adiabatic