27.12.2012 Views

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36<br />

Measurements of Low Energy Nuclear Cross Sections<br />

M. Junker (for the LUNA Collaboration)<br />

Laboratori Nazionali Gran Sasso, Assergi (AQ), Italy<br />

and Institut für Experimentalphysik III, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany<br />

The nuclear reactions of the pp-chain play a key role in the understanding of energy production,<br />

nucleosynthesis and neutrino emission of the elements in stars and especially in our<br />

sun [1]. A comparison of the observed solar neutrino fluxes measured by the experiments<br />

GALLEX/SAGE, HOMESTAKE and KAMIOKANDE provides to date no unique picture<br />

of the microscopic processes in the sun [2]. A solution of this so called “solar neutrino puzzle”<br />

can possibly be found in the areas of neutrino physics, solar physics (models) or nuclear<br />

physics. In view of the important conclusions on non-standard physics, which might be derived<br />

from the results of the present and future solar neutrino experiments, it is essential to<br />

determine the neutrino source power of the sun more reliably.<br />

Due to the Coulomb Barrier involved in the nuclear fusion reactions, the cross section<br />

of a nuclear reaction drops nearly exponentially at energies which are lower than the<br />

Coulomb Barrier, leading to a low-energy limit of the feasible cross section measurements<br />

in a laboratory at the earth surface. Since this energy limit is far above the thermal energy<br />

region of the sun, the high energy data have to be extrapolated down to the energy<br />

region of interest transforming the exponentially dropping cross section σ(E) to the<br />

astrophysical S-factor S(E) = σ(E)E exp(2π η), with the Sommerfeld parameter given by<br />

2π η = 31.29Z1 Z2(µ/E) 1/2 [1]. The quantities Z1 and Z2 are the nuclear charges of the interacting<br />

particles in the entrance channel, µ is the reduced mass (in units of amu), and E<br />

is the center-of-mass energy (in units of keV). In case of a non resonant reaction S(E) may<br />

then be parameterized by the polynomial S(E) = S(0) + S ′ (0)E + 0.5S ′′ (0)E 2 .<br />

As usual in physics, extrapolation of data into the “unknown” can lead onto “icy ground”.<br />

Although experimental techniques have improved over the years to extend cross section measurements<br />

to lower energies, it has not yet been possible to perform measurements within the<br />

thermal energy region in stars.<br />

For nuclear reactions studied in the laboratory, the target nuclei and the projectiles are<br />

usually in the form of neutral atoms/molecules and ions, respectively. The electron clouds<br />

surrounding the interacting nuclides act as a screening potential: the projectile effectively sees<br />

a reduced Coulomb barrier. This leads to a higher cross section, σs(E), than would be the<br />

case for bare nuclei, σb(E), with an exponential enhancement factor flab(E) = σs(E)/σb(E) ≃<br />

exp(πη Ue/E) [3, 4] where Ue is the electron-screening potential energy (e.g. Ue ≃ Z1·Z2·e 2 /Ra<br />

approximately, with Ra an atomic radius). For a stellar plasma the value of σb(E) must be<br />

known because the screening in the plasma can be quite different from that in laboratory studies<br />

[5], and σb(E) must be explicitly included in each situation. Thus, a good understanding<br />

of electron-screening effects is needed to arrive at reliable σb(E) data at low energies. Lowenergy<br />

studies of several fusion reactions involving light nuclides showed [6, 7, 8] indeed the<br />

exponential enhancement of the cross section at low energies. The observed enhancement<br />

(i.e. the value of Ue) was in all cases close to or higher than the adiabatic limit derived from<br />

atomic-physics models. An exception are the 3 He+ 3 He data of Krauss et al. [10], which<br />

show apparently no electron screening down to E=25 keV, although the effects of electron<br />

screening should have enhanced the data at 25 keV by about a factor 1.2 for the adiabatic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!