Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Anisotropic <strong>Neutrino</strong> Propagation in a<br />
Magnetized Plasma<br />
Per Elmfors<br />
Stockholm University, Fysikum, Box 6730, S-113 85 Stockholm, Sweden<br />
Introduction<br />
The idea that a large-scale magnetic field can be responsible for a significant neutrino emission<br />
asymmetry in a supernova explosion goes back to Chugai [1] in 1984. Since then there<br />
have been a number of suggestions of how to implement this idea in more detail. Lately, in<br />
particular after the Ringberg workshop, several papers appeared dealing with how to calculate<br />
neutrino cross sections in a magnetic field more accurately and with more realistic neutron<br />
star parameters [2, 3]. The various approaches are either to use the exact Landau levels for<br />
the charged particles which is necessary for very strong fields, or to include the field effects<br />
only through the polarization of the medium. The disadvantage with the full Landau level<br />
approach is that the number of Landau levels that have to be included grows quadratically<br />
with the Fermi energy. If the field is B ∼ 1 (MeV) 2 ≃ 1.6×10 14 Gauss and Fermi energy<br />
EF = � µ 2 e − m2e ∼ 100 MeV approximately E2 F /2eB ≃ 15000 Landau levels are filled, and<br />
with all the transition matrix elements that have to be calculated the problem becomes a<br />
numerical challenge. For weak fields, where the strength should be compared with E2 F rather<br />
than m2 e, it seems logical to rely on a weak-field approximation.<br />
To explain the observed peculiar velocities of neutron stars by asymmetric neutrino emission<br />
an asymmetry of a few percent is needed. It is found here, as in other recent papers<br />
[3], that the asymmetry in the damping rate is itself much too small for fields of the order<br />
of 1014 –1015 Gauss. On the other hand, it is certain that the final asymmetry cannot be<br />
esitmated simply by the asymmetry in the damping rate. One step towards a more complete<br />
analysis was taken in [4] where a cumulative parity violation was suggested to enhance the<br />
asymmetry. For a reliable estimate it would be desirable to run a full magneto-hydrodynamics<br />
simulation.<br />
In this presentation I shall discuss the asymmetry from the electron polarization in<br />
neutrino–electron scattering and URCA processes. In addition one will have to add the asymmetry<br />
from proton and neutron polarization in URCA processes which may be as important<br />
as the electron polarization. The reason is that polarization of the degenerate electron gas is<br />
suppressed by the large chemical potential even though the electron magnetic moment is much<br />
larger than the nuclear magnetic moment. Furthermore, I am here using free propagators for<br />
the nucleons which may have to be improved to account for rapid spin-flip processes [5].<br />
<strong>Neutrino</strong> Damping and the Imaginary Part of the Self-Energy<br />
The simplest formalism for computing damping coefficients in thermal field theory is, in my<br />
opinion, from the imaginary part of the self-energy [6, 7]. The relation to be used for a<br />
neutrino with momentum Q is<br />
Γ(Q) = − 〈ν|ImΣ(Q)|ν〉<br />
〈ν|ν〉<br />
79<br />
. (1)