27.12.2012 Views

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Anisotropic <strong>Neutrino</strong> Propagation in a<br />

Magnetized Plasma<br />

Per Elmfors<br />

Stockholm University, Fysikum, Box 6730, S-113 85 Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Introduction<br />

The idea that a large-scale magnetic field can be responsible for a significant neutrino emission<br />

asymmetry in a supernova explosion goes back to Chugai [1] in 1984. Since then there<br />

have been a number of suggestions of how to implement this idea in more detail. Lately, in<br />

particular after the Ringberg workshop, several papers appeared dealing with how to calculate<br />

neutrino cross sections in a magnetic field more accurately and with more realistic neutron<br />

star parameters [2, 3]. The various approaches are either to use the exact Landau levels for<br />

the charged particles which is necessary for very strong fields, or to include the field effects<br />

only through the polarization of the medium. The disadvantage with the full Landau level<br />

approach is that the number of Landau levels that have to be included grows quadratically<br />

with the Fermi energy. If the field is B ∼ 1 (MeV) 2 ≃ 1.6×10 14 Gauss and Fermi energy<br />

EF = � µ 2 e − m2e ∼ 100 MeV approximately E2 F /2eB ≃ 15000 Landau levels are filled, and<br />

with all the transition matrix elements that have to be calculated the problem becomes a<br />

numerical challenge. For weak fields, where the strength should be compared with E2 F rather<br />

than m2 e, it seems logical to rely on a weak-field approximation.<br />

To explain the observed peculiar velocities of neutron stars by asymmetric neutrino emission<br />

an asymmetry of a few percent is needed. It is found here, as in other recent papers<br />

[3], that the asymmetry in the damping rate is itself much too small for fields of the order<br />

of 1014 –1015 Gauss. On the other hand, it is certain that the final asymmetry cannot be<br />

esitmated simply by the asymmetry in the damping rate. One step towards a more complete<br />

analysis was taken in [4] where a cumulative parity violation was suggested to enhance the<br />

asymmetry. For a reliable estimate it would be desirable to run a full magneto-hydrodynamics<br />

simulation.<br />

In this presentation I shall discuss the asymmetry from the electron polarization in<br />

neutrino–electron scattering and URCA processes. In addition one will have to add the asymmetry<br />

from proton and neutron polarization in URCA processes which may be as important<br />

as the electron polarization. The reason is that polarization of the degenerate electron gas is<br />

suppressed by the large chemical potential even though the electron magnetic moment is much<br />

larger than the nuclear magnetic moment. Furthermore, I am here using free propagators for<br />

the nucleons which may have to be improved to account for rapid spin-flip processes [5].<br />

<strong>Neutrino</strong> Damping and the Imaginary Part of the Self-Energy<br />

The simplest formalism for computing damping coefficients in thermal field theory is, in my<br />

opinion, from the imaginary part of the self-energy [6, 7]. The relation to be used for a<br />

neutrino with momentum Q is<br />

Γ(Q) = − 〈ν|ImΣ(Q)|ν〉<br />

〈ν|ν〉<br />

79<br />

. (1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!