27.12.2012 Views

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170<br />

<strong>Neutrino</strong>s in <strong>Astrophysics</strong><br />

José W. F. Valle<br />

Instituto de Física Corpuscular—C.S.I.C.<br />

Departament de Física Teòrica, Universitat de València, 46100 Burjassot, València,<br />

Spain (http://neutrinos.uv.es)<br />

<strong>Theory</strong> of <strong>Neutrino</strong> Mass<br />

<strong>Neutrino</strong>s are the only apparently massless electrically neutral fermions in the Standard Model<br />

(SM). Nobody knows why they are so special when compared with the other fermions. The<br />

masslessness of neutrinos is imposed in an ad hoc fashion, not dictated by an underlying<br />

principle such as gauge invariance. Moreover, massless neutrinos may be in conflict with<br />

present data on solar and atmospheric neutrino observations, as well as cosmological data on<br />

the amplitude of primordial density fluctuations [1]. The latter suggest the need for hot dark<br />

matter in the Universe. On the other hand, if massive, neutrinos would pose another puzzle,<br />

namely, why are their masses so much smaller than those of the charged fermions? The key<br />

to the answer may lie in the fact that neutrinos could be Majorana fermions. Such fermions<br />

are the most fundamental ones. If neutrinos are majorana particles the suppression of their<br />

mass could be related to the feebleness of lepton number violation. This, in turn, would point<br />

towards physics beyond the SM.<br />

Lepton number, or B − L can be part of the gauge symmetry [2] or, alternatively, can be<br />

a spontaneously broken global symmetry. In the latter case there is a physical pseudoscalar<br />

Goldstone boson generically called majoron [3]. One can construct an enormous class of such<br />

models [4] which may have important implications not only in astrophysics and cosmology<br />

but also in particle physics [5].<br />

Many mechanisms exist to explain the small masses of neutrinos as a result of the violation<br />

of lepton number. The first is the seesaw mechanism, which is based on the existence of some<br />

relatively large mass scale. However, neutrinos could acquire their mass radiatively. In this<br />

case the smallness of the mass holds even if all the new particles required to generate the<br />

neutrino masses are light and therefore accessible to present experiments [6]. The seesaw and<br />

the radiative mechanisms of neutrino mass generation may be combined. Supersymmetry<br />

with broken R-parity provides a very elegant mechanism for the origin of neutrino mass<br />

[7] in which the tau neutrino ντ acquires a mass due to the mixing between neutrinos and<br />

neutralinos. This happens in a way similar to the seesaw mechanism, in which the large mass<br />

scale is now replaced by a supersymmetry breaking scale characterizing the neutralino sector.<br />

In supergravity models with universal soft breaking scalar masses, this effective neutralinoneutrino<br />

mixing is induced only radiatively [7]. As a result the Majorana ντ mass is naturally<br />

suppressed, even though there is no large mass scale present. From this point of view, the<br />

mechanism is a hybrid between the see-saw idea and the radiative mechanism. Despite the<br />

small neutrino mass, many of the corresponding R-parity violating effects can be sizeable. An<br />

obvious example is the fact that the lightest neutralino decay will typically decay inside the<br />

detector, unlike the case of the minimal supersymmetric model.<br />

Other than the seesaw scheme, none of the above models requires a large mass scale. In all<br />

of them one can implement the spontaneous violation of the lepton number symmetry leading

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!