27.12.2012 Views

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

Proc. Neutrino Astrophysics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

calibration is estimated to be ±2.4% based on the detailed analysis of cosmic-ray muons,<br />

muon-decay electrons and electrons from a linac. The estimated momentum resolutions for<br />

electrons and muons are 2.5%/ � E(GeV) + 0.5% and +3%, respectively.<br />

Results<br />

The data reduction, single-ring selection and lepton identification have been done by 2 groups<br />

independently and the results were found to agree very well. Three simulated samples have<br />

been compared with the data. The simulations used 2 different flux calculations, 3 different<br />

neutrino interaction models and 2 codes for particle and light propagation in the detector.<br />

All the simulated samples were processed by the same procedures as the data. The differences<br />

were used in estimates of systematic errors. The results discussed below come from one data<br />

analysis and Monte Carlo simulations based on flux calculations of Ref. [1].<br />

Out of about 300 million triggers recorded during 320 days of detector operation between<br />

May 1996 and June 1997, about 5000 events were classified as fully-contained events, i.e.<br />

events with no significant energy deposit outside of the inner detector. Using the photon<br />

time-arrival information recorded by PMTs, 2708 events with energy Evis > 30 MeV had<br />

vertices reconstructed in the fiducial volume. The visible energy Evis is defined as the energy<br />

of an electron which would produce the same number of Cherenkov photons.<br />

From Monte Carlo simulation it is estimated that 83.2% of all charged-current neutrino<br />

interactions in the fiducial volume are retained in the current sample. The remaining<br />

fraction of 16.8% consists mostly of events with exiting particles (9.3%) or energy lower<br />

than 30 MeV (5.8%).<br />

To study the neutrino flavor composition we select a sample of single-ring events. Quasielastic<br />

interactions, for which the information about neutrino flavor is provided by the charged<br />

lepton identification, consist 75 ± 3% of the sample. Particle identification is based on the<br />

pattern of Čerenkov rings. Diffuse, showering patterns associated with electromagnetic cas-<br />

cades (e-like events), are separated from sharper, non-showering rings caused by stopping<br />

muons (µ-like events). The misidentification probability for single-ring events is estimated<br />

to be 0.8 ± 0.1%.<br />

The results for events with Evis < 1.33 GeV (Sub-GeV sample) are presented in Table 1.<br />

For single-track events the electron and muon momenta are greater than 100 and 200 MeV/c,<br />

respectively. From these data one obtains: R = 0.63 ± 0.03(stat) ± 0.05(sys). The systematic<br />

error of 8% comes mostly form uncertainty in the calculation of the νµ/νe ratio (5%), uncertainties<br />

in interaction cross sections and nuclear effects in 16 O (4.1%), single-ring selection<br />

(4%) and particle identification (2%).<br />

An independent signature of muon neutrino interactions is provided by electrons from<br />

muon decays. The detection efficiency for muon decay is estimated to be 0.80 for µ + and<br />

0.63 for µ + . The fraction of µ-like events with a decay electron is 67.5 ± 1.7% for the data<br />

and 68.2 ± 1.0% for MC. For e-like events the corresponding fractions are 9.3 ± 1.1% and<br />

8.0 ± 0.3%.<br />

Angular distributions of the reconstructed track directions for single-ring events have also<br />

been studied. Figure 1 displays the distributions of zenith angles for µ-like and e-like events.<br />

The double ratio R dependence on the zenith angle is shown in Figure 2.<br />

Preliminary results of the analysis of the Multi-GeV sample of events with Evis > 1.33<br />

GeV is shown in Table 2. The resulting double ratio is R = 0.60 ± 0.06(stat) ± 0.07(sys).<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!