Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith
Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith
Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
egeneration at a high enough concentration (> 90%) for compression. The process is termed “postcombustion<br />
capture”. One can also remove <strong>CO2</strong> <strong>from</strong> the fuel before combustion (“pre-combustion capture”)<br />
by converting it to hydrogen and <strong>CO2</strong> by means of a water-gas shift reaction. <strong>CO2</strong> is collected after<br />
the shift then hydrogen is burned to generate electricity. The third option is to feed the plant with pure<br />
oxygen instead of <strong>air</strong>, an “oxyfuel” system. This way, the flue gas has a high enough <strong>CO2</strong> concentration to<br />
be compressed directly. Energy is saved by avoiding the solvent absorption and regenerating but expended<br />
for separation of oxygen <strong>from</strong> <strong>air</strong>.<br />
Once compressed to a liquid, the <strong>CO2</strong> is ready for transportation to a sequestration site, which generally<br />
occurs via a pipeline like those currently used for oil and gas. Sequestration sites may include spent oil<br />
fields and unmineable coal seams, where the cost of storage can be offset by enhanced recovery of oil<br />
or extraction of methane, respectively. <strong>CO2</strong> can also be pumped into the ocean, though this may have<br />
harmful side-effects. The most secure type of sites are deep saline aquifers, which also have the largest<br />
estimated storage capacity: at least 40 years of <strong>CO2</strong> emitted at the current rate, and probably much more<br />
(IPCC, 2005).<br />
There are three currently operating industrial scale CCS projects, with many more planned. IPCC<br />
expects that CCS will be widely deployed when the cost of <strong>CO2</strong> emissions (value of emissions reduction)<br />
reaches 25–30 $/t-<strong>CO2</strong>, and that CCS will account for a substantial share of carbon mitigation in future<br />
scenarios with carbon restrictions.<br />
In the form described, CCS can only work with <strong>CO2</strong> <strong>from</strong> points sources, which currently account<br />
for about 40% of total emissions (and many of those point sources would be small, inaccessible by <strong>CO2</strong><br />
pipelines, or otherwise not amenable to carbon capture). CCS can facilitate reductions in other sectors if<br />
vehicles, home heating, and other distributed sources are made to run on hydrogen which in turn is produced<br />
in facilities equipped with CCS. Uncertainty remains about the feasibility and cost of switching to<br />
this “hydrogen economy”, and it may be high; <strong>Keith</strong> and Farrell (2003) calculate that the cost of switching<br />
to hydrogen fuel cell cars could be 300 $/t-<strong>CO2</strong>.<br />
Even with a very successful CCS program and aggressive deployment of alternative energy sources, atmospheric<br />
concentrations of <strong>CO2</strong> will continue increasing throughout the century (IPCC, 2000a). Because<br />
<strong>CO2</strong> is long-lived in the atmosphere, cutting emissions does not reduce the concentration, but rather slows<br />
the rate of increase. If emissions are cut to zero, it would still take many centuries for natural removal<br />
mechanisms to bring <strong>CO2</strong> close to pre-industrial levels.<br />
1.2 Air capture<br />
Though nearly all current research on CCS focuses on capture <strong>from</strong> large point sources, it is also possible<br />
to capture <strong>CO2</strong> directly <strong>from</strong> the atmosphere, a process we call “<strong>air</strong> capture”. Compared with point source<br />
capture, <strong>air</strong> capture has several advantages. <strong>CO2</strong> emissions <strong>from</strong> any sector can be captured, including<br />
emissions <strong>from</strong> diffuse sources such as automobiles, <strong>air</strong>planes, agriculture, and home heating. The capture<br />
unit can be located at a favorable sequestration site, avoiding the need for extensive <strong>CO2</strong>-transportation<br />
infrastructure. Consider a future climate scenario where society has been slow to adopt mitigation measures,<br />
but a sudden shift in the climate system dramatically raises concern and demand for action. Because<br />
3