27.12.2012 Views

Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith

Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith

Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3.1 <strong>CO2</strong> depletion in <strong>air</strong><br />

With longer residence times and denser sprays, the <strong>CO2</strong> in <strong>air</strong> becomes depleted toward the bottom of the<br />

tower, leading to lower absorption efficiency there. This is an effect common to a large class of absorbers,<br />

and is generally represented by first order decay (F<strong>air</strong> et al., 2001). This effect was already accounted for<br />

in Table 3.1, and is relatively minor unless the system is tuned to capture much more than half of the <strong>CO2</strong><br />

<strong>from</strong> process <strong>air</strong>.<br />

3.3.2 Changing drop size due to evaporation<br />

There is also an effect of changing drop size due to evaporation as the drops fall. Theoretically, absorption<br />

will decrease because of the smaller surface area as the drop evaporates, but increase because the OH −<br />

becomes more concentrated. We know <strong>from</strong> Equation 3.5 and the preceding derivation that absorption is<br />

proportional to surface area, As, and to the square root of [OH − ]:<br />

Q ∝ As[OH − ] 1 2.<br />

Replacing those terms with their relationships to drop volume,Vd, we get:<br />

Q ∝ V 2 3<br />

d<br />

·(V −1<br />

d ) 1 2 = V 1 6<br />

d .<br />

As the drop evaporates, Vd gets smaller so absorption declines, but not very quickly. The change in volume<br />

for a single pass should not be very large to begin with, perhaps 20% for a high evaporation rate. This<br />

gives a maximum change in instantaneous absorption rate of about 4%. Thus, changing drop size due to<br />

evaporation does not appear to have a significant effect on scale-up.<br />

3.3.3 Spray droplet collision, coalescence, and breakup<br />

As drops fall through the tower, they collide with each other. If we assume a roughly uniform flow field,<br />

then this process is driven by differential settling. That is, larger drops fall faster and strike smaller drops<br />

beneath them. If the distribution of drops were monodisperse, i.e. all drops were the same size, then no<br />

collisions would occur. With a very wide distribution, collisions tend to be dominated by the largest drops<br />

falling very fast and striking smaller drops along the way. When two drops collide, essentially one of<br />

two things can happen: they can coalesce into a larger stable drop (“coalescence”), or they can coalesce<br />

temporarily then break apart into many, smaller drops (“collisional breakup”) due to internal turbulence<br />

created by the collision or entrained <strong>air</strong> causing instability. They can also bounce off one another, retaining<br />

their original sizes, but for purposes of calculation this is not considered a collision.<br />

The probability of coalescence given a collision is denoted Ecoal, and so the probability of breakup<br />

given a collision is (1 − Ecoal). Ecoal is a function of the drop sizes, fluid characteristics (surface tension,<br />

viscosity, ...), collision speed and angle. For water drops falling in <strong>air</strong> and colliding by differential settling,<br />

the only situation we will consider, Ecoal is only a function of drop size and it is found empirically. Values<br />

range <strong>from</strong> close to 1 for both drops smaller than 50 µm in diameter, to 0.5 for a 300 µm drop striking a<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!