Acknowledgments When I was deciding which graduate school to attend, I asked several Civil and Environmental Engineering students at Carnegie Mellon (CMU) about how the students related with each other, whether they were competitive, whether they tend to help each other out, and so forth. Then-graduate-student Joe Bushey replied that the general feeling is that “we’re all trying to save the world here, so we might as well do it together”. After four years at CMU, this is the best way I can describe the interactions I have had with colleagues in my departments and elsewhere on campus. I can’t think of a time, in this wonderfully collaborative and cooperative environment, when I was denied assistance by anyone or when I declined to give assistance when asked. The seminars, reading groups, and informal talks with students and professors have stimulated my thinking, broadened my knowledge, and improved my research. I must thank my superlative colleagues for making my time at CMU enjoyable and deeply satisfying. The spirit of cooperative assistance is exemplified by my friend and colleague Jeffrey Pierce, who took nights out of his vacation to write code for, and help me use, a model of drop coalescence in the late days of this thesis, handily navigating my complete inexperience with Fortran 77 and mounting deadline-related desperation. I must thank Professor Granger Morgan for his unwavering enthusiasm (even, perhaps, when my own wavered) and support for my research and his wisdom in many subjects. I thank Professor Jay Apt, also for his enthusiasm, and for providing me with many opportunities to present my findings. I thank Peter Adams for some very key research help, particularly on modeling coalescence, but on other topics as well. I also thank Professor Edward Rubin for adamantly pointing out a weakness in my research which, in large part, pushed me to model coalescence in the first place. I owe the success of the prototype experiments partly to two excellent, hard-working undergraduates at the University of Calgary: Kenton Heidel and Leif Menezes. Without their labors, the completion of those experiments would not have been possible in the short summer I spent in Calgary. The construction of that prototype was also aided by practical advice <strong>from</strong> Professor Larry Cartwright, who I thank for demonstrating in many subtle (as well as obvious) ways what it is to be an engineer. Of course I owe the largest debt of gratitude to my advisors. I thank Professor Greg Lowry for the years of help and support, particularly his open-door policy and frequent guidance on practical matters and for his remarkable experimental insight. The same thanks go to Professor <strong>David</strong> <strong>Keith</strong>, particularly for challenging me and for having big ideas and inviting my opinions on them. The research presented in this thesis was funded <strong>from</strong> a variety of sources: the Pittsburgh Infrastructure Technology Alliance (PITA), the Carnegie Mellon Seed Fund, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, and the Climate Decision Making Center (CDMC), which was created through a cooperative agreement iv
etween the National Science Foundation (SES-0345798) and Carnegie Mellon University. v
- Page 1 and 2: Capturing CO2 from ambient air: a f
- Page 3: For my family, friends, and everyon
- Page 7 and 8: Contents Acknowledgments iv Abstrac
- Page 9 and 10: List of Figures 1.1 Global CO2 emis
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter 1 Introduction The climate
- Page 13 and 14: egeneration at a high enough concen
- Page 15 and 16: 1.4 Routes to air capture 1.4.1 Org
- Page 17 and 18: The NaOH approach is the primary su
- Page 19 and 20: there is no compelling reason to ca
- Page 21 and 22: 7Na2CO3(l)+5Na2Ti3O7(s) ⇋ 4Na8Ti5
- Page 23 and 24: changing the process design to acco
- Page 25 and 26: Component / source GJ/t-CO2 electri
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 3 Contactor In this chapter
- Page 29 and 30: the CO2 capture rate in a spray sys
- Page 31 and 32: CO 2 absorption per pass [mol/l] 10
- Page 33 and 34: CO 2 absorption [mmol/pass] 16 14 1
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 3.5: Water loss measured in
- Page 37 and 38: 3.3.1 CO2 depletion in air With lon
- Page 39 and 40: where vt,1 and vt,2 are the termina
- Page 41 and 42: surface area [m 2 -surface / m 3 -r
- Page 43 and 44: spray mass density [kg / ln(μm)] 1
- Page 45 and 46: average surface area [m 2 -spray /
- Page 47 and 48: As a bound on the effects of coales
- Page 49 and 50: Draft type Height [m] Crosssectiona
- Page 51 and 52: 2. Median assumptions, no coalescen
- Page 53 and 54: capture system. We can also see tha
- Page 55 and 56:
Multistage spray One possible solut
- Page 57 and 58:
Although, the cost of water loss ma
- Page 59 and 60:
3.5.6 Solids formation - scaling an
- Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 4 Cost of air capture Altho
- Page 63 and 64:
Capital Capacity Electric a Thermal
- Page 65 and 66:
Component Capital + O&M Energy cost
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 5 Discussion Overview In th
- Page 69 and 70:
5.2 Lessons for assessing of future
- Page 71 and 72:
Bibliography Adams, P. J. and Seinf
- Page 73 and 74:
IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: M
- Page 75 and 76:
Tzivion, S., Feingold, G., and Levi
- Page 77 and 78:
F Liquid flow rate in the contactor
- Page 79 and 80:
Appendix B Experimental details and
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure B.2: Photograph of completed
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure B.4: Two cranes lift the rea
- Page 85 and 86:
fastened together and lined, the re
- Page 87 and 88:
The prototype has three particle fi
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure B.7: Sampling points of CO2
- Page 91 and 92:
In order to calculate CO2 absorbed,
- Page 93 and 94:
Absorbed CO 2 [mol/l] 0.3 0.25 0.2
- Page 95:
periodic switching of the spray on