Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith
Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith
Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
As a bound on the effects of coalescence, we will consider contactors where S = 1 m 2 /m 3 in a single fluid<br />
system, and S = 2 in an <strong>air</strong>-assist system.<br />
3.4 Contactor Cost<br />
Estimating the cost of a contactor is a dual problem. On the one hand, we try to estimate the capital and<br />
operating costs of a device to be built in the future to which no complete analogue currently exists. On the<br />
other hand, we must assume that the future engineers of the device will optimize the design to minimize<br />
costs, and they will have considerable leeway to do so. So the two sides of the problem, specifying the<br />
design and estimating the costs, feed back on each other.<br />
Air capture only makes sense in a very large scale deployment, so we can expect that engineers designing<br />
such devices will not be limited to off-the-shelf technology or process experience <strong>from</strong> other industries,<br />
especially since here we are not concerned with the cost of early <strong>air</strong> capture plants, but of the average or<br />
“nth plant” cost. In order to estimate that cost today we have to make some informed judgment about what<br />
the optimal system will look like. We must do so under considerable uncertainty about some parameters –<br />
uncertainty that would be resolved for those future engineers. In particular, our uncertainty about the full<br />
effects of coalescence and breakup, and about the technical potential and costs of relevant technologies,<br />
makes specifying the contactor difficult.<br />
Ideally we would like to build all of the relevant parameters and functions into a cost model and<br />
perform a nonlinear optimization to find the system which minimizes cost per unit <strong>CO2</strong> captured, as the<br />
engineers and operators of a real plant are likely to do. However, we do not have sufficient knowledge of<br />
the functional relationship between, for example, capital cost and contactor height, or spray nozzle type<br />
and operating cost, to complete such a model. Instead we will choose several scenarios, and for each<br />
scenario choose a set of reasonable (but not optimal) parameters to use in a simple cost model. The goal<br />
will be to choose parameters such that they are on the order of the likely optimums while being well<br />
withing the practical capabilities of known technology.<br />
We know our model overestimates the rate of coalescence, so we will bound the effect of coalescence<br />
by considering no-coalescence cases and cases based on the model results. We will also consider systems<br />
using single fluid nozzles and using <strong>air</strong>-assist nozzles.<br />
3.4.1 Mass transfer<br />
We define the <strong>CO2</strong> absorption rate constant, kspray, such that<br />
dC<br />
dt = SksprayC(t) (3.14)<br />
where C is the <strong>CO2</strong> concentration in <strong>air</strong> in mol/m 3 . Then kspray is the absorption rate per unit <strong>CO2</strong> in <strong>air</strong><br />
per unit drop surface area, with units:<br />
kspray ∼ ( mol<br />
s<br />
1 m3 m<br />
)(<br />
m2)( ) =<br />
mol s<br />
37