27.12.2012 Views

Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith

Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith

Capturing CO2 from ambient air - David Keith

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As a bound on the effects of coalescence, we will consider contactors where S = 1 m 2 /m 3 in a single fluid<br />

system, and S = 2 in an <strong>air</strong>-assist system.<br />

3.4 Contactor Cost<br />

Estimating the cost of a contactor is a dual problem. On the one hand, we try to estimate the capital and<br />

operating costs of a device to be built in the future to which no complete analogue currently exists. On the<br />

other hand, we must assume that the future engineers of the device will optimize the design to minimize<br />

costs, and they will have considerable leeway to do so. So the two sides of the problem, specifying the<br />

design and estimating the costs, feed back on each other.<br />

Air capture only makes sense in a very large scale deployment, so we can expect that engineers designing<br />

such devices will not be limited to off-the-shelf technology or process experience <strong>from</strong> other industries,<br />

especially since here we are not concerned with the cost of early <strong>air</strong> capture plants, but of the average or<br />

“nth plant” cost. In order to estimate that cost today we have to make some informed judgment about what<br />

the optimal system will look like. We must do so under considerable uncertainty about some parameters –<br />

uncertainty that would be resolved for those future engineers. In particular, our uncertainty about the full<br />

effects of coalescence and breakup, and about the technical potential and costs of relevant technologies,<br />

makes specifying the contactor difficult.<br />

Ideally we would like to build all of the relevant parameters and functions into a cost model and<br />

perform a nonlinear optimization to find the system which minimizes cost per unit <strong>CO2</strong> captured, as the<br />

engineers and operators of a real plant are likely to do. However, we do not have sufficient knowledge of<br />

the functional relationship between, for example, capital cost and contactor height, or spray nozzle type<br />

and operating cost, to complete such a model. Instead we will choose several scenarios, and for each<br />

scenario choose a set of reasonable (but not optimal) parameters to use in a simple cost model. The goal<br />

will be to choose parameters such that they are on the order of the likely optimums while being well<br />

withing the practical capabilities of known technology.<br />

We know our model overestimates the rate of coalescence, so we will bound the effect of coalescence<br />

by considering no-coalescence cases and cases based on the model results. We will also consider systems<br />

using single fluid nozzles and using <strong>air</strong>-assist nozzles.<br />

3.4.1 Mass transfer<br />

We define the <strong>CO2</strong> absorption rate constant, kspray, such that<br />

dC<br />

dt = SksprayC(t) (3.14)<br />

where C is the <strong>CO2</strong> concentration in <strong>air</strong> in mol/m 3 . Then kspray is the absorption rate per unit <strong>CO2</strong> in <strong>air</strong><br />

per unit drop surface area, with units:<br />

kspray ∼ ( mol<br />

s<br />

1 m3 m<br />

)(<br />

m2)( ) =<br />

mol s<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!