28.12.2012 Views

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>JURE</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference <strong>Programme</strong> Friday, July 27<br />

c) Group 3 (N=298) seem to have a mixed approach but emphasizing code instruction; and,<br />

finally d) Group 4 (N=255) with a really balanced approach.<br />

PA.7.5. Text and Graphic Comprehension: Eye-­‐Tracking Approaches<br />

Paper Session, 9.30-­‐10.30, Room: H26<br />

Chair: Tamara Marksteiner<br />

An on-­‐site Training on Picture-­‐reading: useful or not?<br />

Melina Klepsch<br />

& Tina Seufert<br />

Pictures come across us every day. But only few people have developed a strategy to “read”<br />

pictures and therefore are able to understand the picture and comprehend the conclusion. In an<br />

experimental study we analyzed whether an on-­‐site training on picture reading fostered<br />

learners understanding of pictures. Half of the learners, which took part in the study, where<br />

given an on-­‐site training on picture-­‐reading, in addition they trained the given strategy over one<br />

week. After this week, all learners had to work with diagrams and realistic pictures, which they<br />

were supposed to look at closely so that they could answer questions. Results indicate that the<br />

type of a picture is crucial for the effectiveness of the training. For diagrams the training showed<br />

an effect, whereas for realistic pictures no effect could be found.<br />

More words say less – comparing quantity and quality in verbal answers in an eye-­‐<br />

tracking study with dyslexics.<br />

Eva Wennås Brante<br />

It is commonly assumed that presenting information in more than one modality will enhance the<br />

learning effect, hence the frequent use of pictures in text<strong>book</strong>s. Pictures are also excellent<br />

complements to words giving an additionally and different representation of the presented<br />

information, making it possible to discern a part/whole relationship in the learning material . To<br />

integrate pictures with a text require however more processes than only reading. We were<br />

interested in finding out how individuals with dyslexia coped with such demands and if it was<br />

possible to find qualitative differences in reading comprehension questions after subjects had<br />

either read texts only or texts integrated with pictures. 19 subjects age 19-­‐28, were recruited.<br />

Nine met the text only condition and ten the text-­‐picture condition. Subjects read about six<br />

different art-­‐genres on a screen and their eye-­‐movements were recorded. After each art genre<br />

one open question were asked and the subjects oral replies were captured through a web-­‐cam,<br />

the answers were transcribed and analyzed by the use of concepts as complexity in syntax, use<br />

of inferences in speech and length of answers. Answers from the two conditions were contrasted<br />

with one another. Results showed that answers in the text only condition were shorter but with<br />

more condensed meaning, that is, even if the text only answers consisted of fewer words they<br />

had a more uninterrupted syntax and respondents from this condition made more inferences.<br />

The result is confirmed by the measures from two multiple choice questions in the study,<br />

showing that the text-­‐picture condition gave a slightly poorer reading comprehension. Thereby<br />

results from this study show that pictures not clearly and consequently improve reading<br />

comprehension<br />

Coffee/Tea<br />

10:30-­‐11:00, Foyer, Ground Floor<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!