28.12.2012 Views

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>JURE</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference <strong>Programme</strong> Wednesday, July 25<br />

Wednesday, July 25<br />

Registration<br />

08:30-­‐09:30, Foyer, Ground Floor<br />

Paper sessions<br />

09:30-­‐10:30<br />

PA.4.1. Teacher Competences in the Workplace<br />

Paper Session, 9.30-­‐10.30, Room: VG 1.30<br />

Chair: Anett Kádár<br />

Experts beat Intermediates -­‐ Why Experts’ Explanations are More Effective in Fostering<br />

Novices’ Transfer of Learning than Explanations Generated by Intermediates<br />

Andreas Lachner<br />

Johannes Gurlitt, & Matthias Nückles<br />

Although prior research has shown that explanations by subject matter experts are superior<br />

compared to explanations by intermediates with regard to transferring knowledge to novices,<br />

little is known about which features of experts’ explanations foster novices’ transfer. To<br />

investigate the effect of the instructor’s subject matter expertise on novices’ learning, we<br />

conducted an experiment (N = 74). Novices were provided with one of four randomly selected<br />

explanations. Two explanations were experts’ explanations and two were intermediates’<br />

explanations from a former experiment that varied in the degree of coherence and generality.<br />

We showed that novices who learned from experts’ explanations outperformed novices who<br />

learned from intermediates’ explanations on transfer tasks. Contrast analyses showed that the<br />

high coherence and medium generality of expert’s explanations accounted for novices’ transfer<br />

of learning. Additional explorative qualitative analyses of novices’ verbal protocols during the<br />

learning phase suggested that high coherence and a medium generality of experts’ explanations<br />

fostered novices’ active processing of the explanations, i.e. novices who learned with an expert’s<br />

explanation generated more elaborations and draw more bridging inferences, whereas novices<br />

who learned with an intermediate’s explanation predominantly relied on surface learning<br />

strategies. Thus, for tasks that require novices to apply their knowledge, it seems to be an<br />

effective instructional strategy to provide novices with experts’ explanations as an appropriate<br />

generalized domain schema to transfer their knowledge to other tasks.<br />

Mentors matter!<br />

Hans van der Linden<br />

This paper presents the outcomes of a research on successful mentor competences in the<br />

Regional training school West Friesland, which is a partnership of thirteen secondary schools<br />

and five teacher training institutes on school based teacher training.<br />

In the Netherlands schoolbased teacher training is a common aspect of initial teacher education.<br />

Schools and training institutes together realize the training of prospective teachers. In school<br />

student teachers train their teaching skills; teacher training institute delivers support and tools<br />

to cope with the questions and concerns in the student teachers development that arise at the<br />

workplace. Mentor teachers are crucial in student teachers’ learning at the workplace and play<br />

an important role in connecting theory (institute) and practice (school). However, it is unclear<br />

what competences mentor teachers should have and how these competences can be developed.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!