28.12.2012 Views

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

JURE 2012 Programme book - EARLI Jure 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monday, July 23 <strong>JURE</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Conference <strong>Programme</strong><br />

solving is. Results will be used in order to develop a final game version that will be tested in a<br />

large scale experimental study starting in autumn <strong>2012</strong>. The main topic of the round table<br />

discussion will be connected to our preliminary findings focusing on game features vs. learning<br />

goals.<br />

Pedagogical competencies as a part of professionalism of teachers: the development of a<br />

measurement instrument<br />

Stephanie Moser<br />

Overall objective of this research project is to analyze (non-­‐)conscious cognitive processes of<br />

verbal and visual information processing, their role for multimedia learning, and the genesis of<br />

learning styles as a result out of implicit learning processes. The possibility to present<br />

information in different ways can be seen as an advantage of multimedia learning environments<br />

as they offer the opportunity to respond to the learners’ individuality: learners can directly and<br />

interactively choose those representations which they find most helpful for learning. The<br />

present research focuses on multimedia learning environments regarding in particular the<br />

chance to respond to the learners’ individual learning preferences. Within the field of<br />

multimedia learning and instruction particularly visual and verbal learning styles (or learning<br />

types) gained awareness. Yet learning style theory is inconsistent and there is only insufficient<br />

empirical validation to date, so there is a need for results under clear experimental conditions.<br />

Furthermore, it is also known that appraisal and attribution processes play a role within<br />

multimedia learning. Thus, the present research also takes in account effects of appraisal and<br />

attribution. The present study aims to develop and validate a specific method, an Implicit<br />

Association Test (IAT) to assess learner’s potential implicit learning preferences. If non-­‐<br />

conscious learning preferences are relatively fixed dispositions, they may not change, while<br />

thoughtful learning preferences may be modifiable and change with growing learning<br />

experiences. These processes are described in a preliminary theoretical framework of learning<br />

styles formation.<br />

RO.1.4. Professional Development of Teachers: Instrumentation and<br />

Measurement<br />

Round Table Session, 16.45-­‐18.15, Room: VG 0.15<br />

Chair: Anne Noll<br />

Learning to Deal with Evidence: Construct Modeling for Test Construction<br />

Susanne Heininger<br />

& Manfred Prenzel<br />

The study aims at developing an instrument for assessing the competence of teachers in dealing<br />

with evidence. It is strongly recommended to base professional decisions and actions in teaching<br />

on evidence rather than on personal experience and traditional practice. However, there is a lack<br />

of assessment tools to measure the current competencies of teachers in dealing with evidence.<br />

Based on existing tools of the medical and natural scientific contexts we develop an instrument<br />

assessing the main competencies in evidence-­‐based practice: Appraise and apply evidence. Our<br />

assessment tool consists of text vignettes creating realistic professional situations. Participants<br />

are requested to make a recommendation for the open-­‐ended problem-­‐based scenarios based on<br />

previous knowledge. Subsequently we present specific evidence in the form of four different<br />

research papers with relevant findings for the respective situation. Participants are asked to<br />

make another recommendation for the same scenario now based on presented evidence and to<br />

appraise the quality of presented evidence. For mapping the construct “apply” we classify the<br />

written recommendations using the approach of construct maps by Wilson (2005). Different<br />

competence levels refer to the argumentative using of mentioned reasons in the presented<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!