29.02.2024 Views

Lot's Wife Edition 5 2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SCIENCE & ENGINEERING 35<br />

Hand Sanitiser:<br />

Friend or Foe?<br />

Since its introduction to the public in the 1990s, hand sanitiser<br />

has rapidly grown in popularity. Although its original use was to<br />

minimise the spread of bacteria in hospitals, it has now become<br />

quite common for people to use it on a day-to-day basis.<br />

As we become more and more aware of the harmful bacteria<br />

present in our environment (especially in public places) it is<br />

quite understandable that many of us have become somewhat<br />

‘germaphobic’. It makes sense then that we fight the germs (and<br />

ease our hypochondria) with a little hand sanitiser now and then.<br />

But could hand sanitiser be doing us more harm than good?<br />

Since its introduction to the public in the 1990s, hand<br />

sanitiser has rapidly grown in popularity. Although its<br />

original use was to minimise the spread of bacteria in<br />

hospitals, it has now become quite common for people to<br />

use it on a day-to-day basis. As we become more and more<br />

aware of the harmful bacteria present in our environment<br />

(especially in public places) it is quite understandable<br />

that many of us have become somewhat ‘germaphobic’. It<br />

makes sense then that we fight the germs (and ease our<br />

hypochondria) with a little hand sanitiser now and then. But<br />

could hand sanitiser be doing us more harm than good?<br />

As many of us have already heard, there is talk of ‘super<br />

bugs’ arising from our overuse of antibacterial substances.<br />

For those who haven’t – hand sanitiser (as well as other<br />

antibacterial cleansers) kills up to 99.9% of bacteria. This<br />

means that the surviving .1% of that bacterial population is<br />

immune to the antibacterial agent used. This strain then<br />

reproduces, creating a whole new population of bacteria<br />

much stronger than the last. Re-exposure to antibacterial<br />

cleansers then kills the weaker members of this new strain<br />

meaning the survivors are even stronger and less responsive<br />

to antibiotics. Repeat the cycle again and soon enough, we’ll<br />

be left with super bugs – scary! Unfortunately, in addition<br />

to killing harmful bacteria, antibacterial soaps and hand<br />

sanitisers also kill off our bodies’ good bacteria, making it<br />

even easier for antibiotic-resistant strains to flourish. But<br />

this isn’t even the worst part.<br />

A peer-reviewed journal published in october last year<br />

has shown that using hand sanitiser before exposure to<br />

bisphenol A (BPA) can increase its absorption into our bodies.<br />

BPA is an industrial chemical commonly found in plastics,<br />

including food and beverage packaging. BPA has been linked<br />

to heart disease, hormone disorders, cancer and infertility,<br />

but the Food and Drug Administration has deemed it safe<br />

in low concentrations. Although most of our BPA exposure<br />

comes from food and beverage packaging, thermal receipt<br />

paper is coated with BPA and therefore contains high<br />

quantities of it. The study found that hand sanitiser (as well<br />

as other skin care products) contains mixtures of dermal<br />

penetration enhancing chemicals – in other words, chemicals<br />

that make our skin more absorbent. These are primarily<br />

used to increase the transdermal delivery of drugs. However,<br />

these chemicals have been found to also increase the dermal<br />

absorption of lipophilic compounds such as BPA by up to 100<br />

fold! To make matters worse, people who touched the receipt<br />

paper immediately after using hand sanitiser transferred<br />

significant amounts of free BPA to food they subsequently<br />

touched, thus doubling their exposure. This combination of<br />

dermal and oral absorption resulted in "rapid and dramatic<br />

average maximum increase in bioactive BPA" which – simply<br />

put – means an increased risk of an array of diseases.<br />

Dermal penetration enhancers include the chemicals<br />

triclosan, isopropyl myristate and propylene glycol. These are<br />

commonly found in popular hand sanitiser brands such as<br />

Dettol and Purell. However, on their own these tend to be fairly<br />

safe – with the exception of triclosan. Studies have linked<br />

triclosan to disrupted hormonal development, a reduction<br />

in bacterial resistance and an increase in allergies. The<br />

European Union has already banned the use of triclosan in<br />

all products and the US has reviewed its use with talks of a<br />

potential ban. So look out for this one on the ingredients list.<br />

Luckily, it’s not all doom and gloom. According to the CDC<br />

(Centres for Disease Control and Prevention) washing your<br />

hands the old-fashioned way (with soap and water) for just<br />

20 seconds can be just as effective at ridding your hands<br />

of the nasties without the side effects. In fact, regular hand<br />

soap has been found to be much more effective at ridding<br />

your hands of fat and sugar deposits than hand sanitisers.<br />

Germs aren’t all bad, and are actually a major part of<br />

an active and efficient immune system. Just remember to<br />

wash your hands with some soap and water before eating or<br />

rubbing your eyes and your body will thank you for it.<br />

Image Courtesy of: www.flickr.com/photos/subsetsum/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!