Abel's theorem in problems and solutions - School of Mathematics
Abel's theorem in problems and solutions - School of Mathematics
Abel's theorem in problems and solutions - School of Mathematics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72 Chapter 2<br />
265. Let Prove that<br />
266. Let Prove that<br />
Let us denote by the curve with equation<br />
(i.e., the circle with radius equal to R, oriented counterclockwise).<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the curve is closed the curve<br />
is closed as well Let be the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> turns <strong>of</strong> the curve around the po<strong>in</strong>t (if<br />
does not pass through the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
267. Calculate <strong>and</strong><br />
Let us now <strong>in</strong>crease the radius R from to The curve<br />
will consequently be deformed from to If for a value R*<br />
the curve does not pass through the po<strong>in</strong>t by a sufficiently<br />
small variation <strong>of</strong> R near R* the curve will turn out to be deformed<br />
by too small an amount for the number <strong>of</strong> its turns around the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />
to change: the function is <strong>in</strong>deed cont<strong>in</strong>uous at the value R*. If the<br />
curves avoid the po<strong>in</strong>t for all values <strong>of</strong> R between <strong>and</strong><br />
then is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous function for all S<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
function takes only <strong>in</strong>teger values it can be cont<strong>in</strong>uous only if for<br />
all values <strong>of</strong> it takes a unique value. But, solv<strong>in</strong>g Problem<br />
267, we have obta<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>and</strong> Therefore the<br />
claim that none <strong>of</strong> the curves passes through the po<strong>in</strong>t for<br />
all is untrue. We thus have for a certa<strong>in</strong> In<br />
this way we have proved the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>theorem</strong> 8 .<br />
THEOREM 7. (The fundamental <strong>theorem</strong> <strong>of</strong> the algebra <strong>of</strong> complex<br />
numbers 9 ). The equation<br />
8 Our reason<strong>in</strong>g conta<strong>in</strong>s some non-rigourous passages: it must be considered, <strong>in</strong><br />
general, as an idea <strong>of</strong> the pro<strong>of</strong>. This reason<strong>in</strong>g can, however, be made exact (though<br />
<strong>in</strong> a non-simple way). See, for example, Ch<strong>in</strong>n W.G., Steenrod N.E, (1966), First<br />
Concepts <strong>of</strong> Topology, (Mathematical Association <strong>of</strong> America: Wash<strong>in</strong>gton).<br />
9 This <strong>theorem</strong> was proved <strong>in</strong> 1799 by the German mathematician C.F. Gauss (1777–<br />
1855).