05.01.2013 Views

Abel's theorem in problems and solutions - School of Mathematics

Abel's theorem in problems and solutions - School of Mathematics

Abel's theorem in problems and solutions - School of Mathematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 Chapter 2<br />

265. Let Prove that<br />

266. Let Prove that<br />

Let us denote by the curve with equation<br />

(i.e., the circle with radius equal to R, oriented counterclockwise).<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the curve is closed the curve<br />

is closed as well Let be the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> turns <strong>of</strong> the curve around the po<strong>in</strong>t (if<br />

does not pass through the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

267. Calculate <strong>and</strong><br />

Let us now <strong>in</strong>crease the radius R from to The curve<br />

will consequently be deformed from to If for a value R*<br />

the curve does not pass through the po<strong>in</strong>t by a sufficiently<br />

small variation <strong>of</strong> R near R* the curve will turn out to be deformed<br />

by too small an amount for the number <strong>of</strong> its turns around the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

to change: the function is <strong>in</strong>deed cont<strong>in</strong>uous at the value R*. If the<br />

curves avoid the po<strong>in</strong>t for all values <strong>of</strong> R between <strong>and</strong><br />

then is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous function for all S<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

function takes only <strong>in</strong>teger values it can be cont<strong>in</strong>uous only if for<br />

all values <strong>of</strong> it takes a unique value. But, solv<strong>in</strong>g Problem<br />

267, we have obta<strong>in</strong>ed that <strong>and</strong> Therefore the<br />

claim that none <strong>of</strong> the curves passes through the po<strong>in</strong>t for<br />

all is untrue. We thus have for a certa<strong>in</strong> In<br />

this way we have proved the follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>theorem</strong> 8 .<br />

THEOREM 7. (The fundamental <strong>theorem</strong> <strong>of</strong> the algebra <strong>of</strong> complex<br />

numbers 9 ). The equation<br />

8 Our reason<strong>in</strong>g conta<strong>in</strong>s some non-rigourous passages: it must be considered, <strong>in</strong><br />

general, as an idea <strong>of</strong> the pro<strong>of</strong>. This reason<strong>in</strong>g can, however, be made exact (though<br />

<strong>in</strong> a non-simple way). See, for example, Ch<strong>in</strong>n W.G., Steenrod N.E, (1966), First<br />

Concepts <strong>of</strong> Topology, (Mathematical Association <strong>of</strong> America: Wash<strong>in</strong>gton).<br />

9 This <strong>theorem</strong> was proved <strong>in</strong> 1799 by the German mathematician C.F. Gauss (1777–<br />

1855).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!