06.01.2013 Views

A Decade of NEPAD - Economic Commission for Africa - uneca

A Decade of NEPAD - Economic Commission for Africa - uneca

A Decade of NEPAD - Economic Commission for Africa - uneca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 A <strong>Decade</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>NEPAD</strong>: Deepening <strong>Africa</strong>n Private Sector and Civil Society Ownership and Partnership<br />

strategy, taking into account three critical areas: the communication<br />

within the AU-<strong>NEPAD</strong>-RECs-country framework,<br />

the communication and advocacy <strong>for</strong> the <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />

agenda, value and principles to <strong>Africa</strong>n citizens, and the<br />

image creation about <strong>Africa</strong> internationally. It will aim<br />

at broad outreach within and outside the continent, and<br />

should promote inclusive advocacy processes <strong>for</strong> mobilizing<br />

and drawing upon <strong>Africa</strong>n stakeholders, including<br />

particularly youth, civil society, academia , the private<br />

sector and Diaspora. 9<br />

9 <strong>NEPAD</strong> Secretariat Business Plan, August 2009 – December 2010,<br />

Strategic New Directions, p. 7<br />

Strengths<br />

• Eight years <strong>of</strong> promotion – international brand recognition<br />

• AU backing and integrated agency status<br />

• Adoption by international donor community – Bretton Woods<br />

Organs, OECD states, G8 states, UN system, European Union (EU)<br />

system, major bilateral donors to <strong>Africa</strong><br />

• Backing by <strong>Africa</strong>n multilateral institutions – AfDB, ECA<br />

• REC support<br />

• New 5 year AAP<br />

• New Secretariat Structure<br />

• APRM programme<br />

• CAADP programme<br />

• Growing number <strong>of</strong> private sector and CSO support entities<br />

Weaknesses<br />

• Despite tens years <strong>of</strong> promotion – poor continent level brand<br />

positioning<br />

• Uneven member state support – financially and in terms <strong>of</strong> alignment<br />

with national development programmes<br />

• Week and under-capacitated RECs<br />

• Poor communications network, strategy and implementation programme<br />

–too little engagement with <strong>Africa</strong>’s media<br />

• Limited <strong>Africa</strong>n CSO, private sector and Diaspora engagement<br />

and input<br />

• Over dependence on donor funding<br />

• Competing (appearance <strong>of</strong> competing) <strong>Africa</strong>n development initiatives<br />

– Millennium Challenge Fund, TICAD, EU/ACP Initiatives<br />

• Low level grassroots understanding in <strong>Africa</strong><br />

• Disparate tangible achievement since inception<br />

• Few incentives <strong>for</strong> supporting <strong>NEPAD</strong> implementation<br />

• Limited credit / branding/ recognition given to <strong>NEPAD</strong> <strong>for</strong> successfully<br />

implemented regional projects<br />

Furthermore, key results areas specified in the Business<br />

Plan included:<br />

ӹ Mobilization <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n stakeholders around the AU/<br />

<strong>NEPAD</strong> agenda and programmes; and<br />

ӹ Mobilization <strong>of</strong> popular political support around the<br />

priority projects.<br />

A contemporary SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,<br />

threats) analysis reveals that although the AU/<br />

<strong>NEPAD</strong> initiative has some hurdles to overcome, it is in a<br />

strong position to achieve its ends if it works to leverage<br />

all <strong>of</strong> its resources, including the <strong>Africa</strong>n private sector<br />

and civil society:<br />

Opportunities<br />

• New AAP is more implementation friendly<br />

• New Secretariat has more resources<br />

• Member state recognition that regional integration is key to growth<br />

and development<br />

• Accelerated REC ef<strong>for</strong>ts to integrate<br />

• Existing group <strong>of</strong> projects that <strong>of</strong>fer viable, immediate opportunities<br />

<strong>for</strong> stakeholder engagement<br />

• China, India, Brazil interest in <strong>Africa</strong> creates economic stimulus<br />

<strong>for</strong> many countries on the continent<br />

• Growing intra-regional trade and investment on continent driven<br />

by new regional multinationals from North <strong>Africa</strong>, Nigeria, Kenya<br />

and South <strong>Africa</strong><br />

• Growth in ef<strong>for</strong>ts to channel Diaspora capital to productive investment<br />

and mobilize Diaspora technical resources<br />

• Improvement in tax collection and increased domestic resources<br />

available to support <strong>NEPAD</strong> implementation<br />

Threats<br />

• Continued global financial crisis<br />

• Poor state <strong>of</strong> western state economies which will impact their ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

to make good on aid commitments<br />

• Poor state <strong>of</strong> western and global economies also has the potential<br />

to reduce quantity and earnings from <strong>Africa</strong>n exports<br />

• Competing bilateral commitments – particularly the EU’s <strong>Economic</strong><br />

Partnership Agreement (EPA) arrangements<br />

• Inability to get member states to make <strong>NEPAD</strong> relevant within<br />

national economic development strategies<br />

• Continued duplicity <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t within overlapping RECs<br />

• HIV/AIDs and Malaria as <strong>Africa</strong>n human resource debilitating<br />

pandemics<br />

• High cost <strong>of</strong> implementation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!