08.01.2013 Views

Vishnu - Nagesh D. Sonde

Vishnu - Nagesh D. Sonde

Vishnu - Nagesh D. Sonde

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Therefore, this Creation came to be seen as having been created by him. God<br />

is like the Ocean, the manifestation being as one would see the waves. The waves<br />

exist, but not separate and distinct from the ocean. So does the creation exist not as<br />

separate from the Creator. The tree exists along with the leaves, as separate and not<br />

separate in essence. Every thing exists, even as it exists not separately. He who<br />

knows this becomes part of that Creation. Therefore <strong>Vishnu</strong> is what the Creation<br />

has come to be and who ever sees any difference in <strong>Vishnu</strong> and his Creation will<br />

fall in ignorance. Sri Madhva declares unequivocally that in Vedas, Ramayana,<br />

Mahabharata and puranas from the beginning to the end <strong>Vishnu</strong> alone is eulogized -<br />

„vaodo ramaayaNao caOva puraNao Baarto ca | Adavanto ca maQyao ca ivaYNau: sava-~ gaIyato ||‟. All the names and the gods<br />

mentioned in the Vedas are „naamaaina savaa-iNa naamaivaMSait taM vaO ivaYNauM prmaa dSa-int‟ „AsyaOva sava-naamaaina<br />

vyaitir>sya sava-t: | ya: svatn~: sadOvaok: sa ivaYNau: prmaaomat: |” (<strong>Vishnu</strong> Tatva Nirnaya).<br />

manasaOvaodmaaPtvyaM naoh naanaa|ist ikMcana |<br />

maR%yaao: sa maR%yaUM gacCit ya [h naanaova pSyait || 11 ||<br />

By mind alone can this be recognized that there exist no difference (between the<br />

prime form and the manifest forms). From death to death he goes who sees any<br />

divergence.<br />

Bhashya :<br />

“tqaOvaavayavaanaaM ca gauNaanaaM ca prsprM | ik`yaaNaaM tona caOtoYaaM BaodivaccaaoBayaM ivadu: | yaan%yaOvaaMQatmaao naa~<br />

kayaa- kaicaiWcaarNaa || [it ca | Bavaodok~ saMyaaogao [va Sabdao|ivaruuwyaao: | Qama-yaao$pmaayaaM vaa svalp%vao vaa ivavaixato<br />

|| [it SabdinaNa-yao | Atao naanaovaotIvaSabdao|%yalpivaYayaao BaodaBaod ivapyaSca |” - Similarly, those who see<br />

even slightest divergence in his limbs and attibutes as well as in his actions or their<br />

outcome, they go without doubt to obscure worlds. No other purpose is served by<br />

such usage of contradictory words, the qualification [va word having been used.<br />

Even in the case of considering two righteous priciples are being compared [va or<br />

Alp qualifying words are used, thus has been said in Shabda Nirnaya. Therefore,<br />

the phrase „naanaa‟ and „[va‟ means „insignificant‟ or „no difference‟.<br />

“p`qamaa ya [h naanaova pSyatIit sva$pBaod inaYaoQaaqa-ma\ | naoh naanaaist ikMcanaoit ikMcana SabdadvayavaanaaM<br />

gauNaanaaM ik`yaaNaaM ca prsprM tWtaM ca BaodinaSaoQaaqa-ma\ || - In the beginning in saying “ya [h naanaova<br />

pSyatIit” it is suggested that there is no difference between the original unmanifest<br />

form of the Supreme Being and in the various manifest forms. Later in “naanaaist<br />

ikMcanaoit ikMcana” it is suggested that there is no difference between the attributes and<br />

actions in original unmanifest Supreme Being and the attributes and actions in the<br />

various manifest forms.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!