12.01.2013 Views

Sea of Shadows eBook - Navy Thriller.com

Sea of Shadows eBook - Navy Thriller.com

Sea of Shadows eBook - Navy Thriller.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 JEFF EDWARDS<br />

unanimous in saying that Kennedy would have survived his other injuries<br />

if not for the head shot. Popular theories argue for a second, or even a<br />

third gunman in the shooting, but no one seriously disputes the fact that a<br />

single 6.5mm bullet ended John F. Kennedy’s life. It’s impossible to<br />

know if the world was changed for the better or the worse in the wake <strong>of</strong><br />

JFK’s assassination. But there’s no doubt that Lyndon Johnson’s vision<br />

for American was different from Kennedy’s. LBJ had different views on<br />

Vietnam, human rights, and the future <strong>of</strong> the space program. And he led<br />

the most powerful nation on Earth down different paths than Kennedy<br />

might have taken.<br />

Are these examples pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the concept that inanimate objects can<br />

drive the forces <strong>of</strong> history? To verify the validity <strong>of</strong> the assertion, we must<br />

work the problem in reverse, in the same manner that we can check our<br />

answer to a mathematical equation by working backward from the answer.<br />

To determine if the bullet that killed Kennedy was truly responsible for<br />

altering human events, we can ask two simple questions: If that particular<br />

bullet had misfired, or gone astray, would the world be a demonstrably<br />

different place than it is today? And, in natural corollary to the first<br />

question, would JFK have made different decisions as president than did<br />

his successor, Lyndon Johnson? If the answer to either question is yes, we<br />

must conclude that a single 6.5mm rifle bullet seized control <strong>of</strong> the destiny<br />

<strong>of</strong> the most powerful nation on Earth, and therefore the destiny <strong>of</strong><br />

mankind.<br />

The same sort <strong>of</strong> reverse check can be run on the atomic bomb<br />

question. If the bomb at Hiroshima had failed to detonate (for whatever<br />

reason), would the world be a different place? Would the nuclear arms<br />

race have ever <strong>com</strong>e to pass? Would mankind have ever been forced to<br />

live under the threat <strong>of</strong> nuclear annihilation?<br />

These examples are relatively easy to recognize: the airplane, the Abomb,<br />

the bullet that killed a president. But there are other instances, other<br />

objects or machines that have shaped the fate <strong>of</strong> our planet.<br />

One particular device has been the engine <strong>of</strong> history on numerous<br />

occasions, and yet its impact is almost entirely overlooked. The torpedo.<br />

On at least five verifiable instances in recorded history, the torpedo has<br />

be<strong>com</strong>e the lever <strong>of</strong> Archimedes: the machine that moved the world.<br />

To examine the influence <strong>of</strong> the torpedo, we must examine the history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the torpedo itself. When was the torpedo invented? How did this<br />

influential and deadly device <strong>com</strong>e into being?<br />

Some military historians trace the origins <strong>of</strong> the torpedo back to the<br />

Roman Empire, and the fire ships that the ancient Romans would send<br />

drifting amongst the fleets <strong>of</strong> their enemies. Others prefer to attribute the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!