13.01.2013 Views

Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols

Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols

Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 Trewhella and Krueger<br />

P(r) function derived for CaM within the complex shows that it undergoes an<br />

unhindered conformational collapse upon binding MLCK that is indistinguishable<br />

from that observed with the isolated CaM-binding peptides. This result<br />

requires that the CaM-binding domain, as well as some portion of its neighboring<br />

residues in the sequence be completely removed from interactions with the<br />

catalytic core. The model further shows that CaM binds to the enzyme at a site<br />

that is distant from the catalytic cleft, which also requires a significant movement<br />

of the autoinhibitory sequence away from the surface of the catalytic<br />

core. These data provided the first direct structural evidence for the<br />

autoinhibitory hypothesis for MLCK activation.<br />

The neutron experiments further revealed that the binding of a peptide substrate<br />

and a nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP (AMP.PNP) to the 4Ca 2+ /CaMbound<br />

kinase results in a “closure” of the enzyme’s catalytic cleft, thus bringing<br />

together all the elements required for catalysis. In addition, the separation of<br />

the centers-of-mass of the CaM and MLCK components is shortened (by<br />

approx 12 Å bringing CaM closer to the catalytic site. Finally, there is a reorientation<br />

of CaM with respect to the kinase upon substrate binding that results<br />

in interactions between the N-terminal sequence of CaM and the kinase that<br />

were not observed in the complex without substrates. This reorientation is of<br />

particular interest in light of the observation that deletion of the N-terminal<br />

leader sequence of CaM abolished CaM-dependent activation of skeletal<br />

muscle MLCK although having no effect on the apparent affinity (20). The<br />

neutron-derived models thus provide evidence that there is an interaction<br />

between the N-terminal helix of CaM and the surface of the kinase that is<br />

important for activation.<br />

Small-angle X-ray scattering has recently provided evidence for a 2Ca 2+ /<br />

CaM/MLCK intermediate in the MLCK activation mechanism (21). Analysis<br />

of the forward scattering, or I 0, data from a Ca 2+ titration of CaM/MLCK complexes<br />

showed that there is full complex formation when there is only two mole<br />

equivalents of Ca 2+ per complex. This 2Ca 2+ intermediate had been suggested<br />

to exist under physiological conditions in the absence of a Ca 2+ signal (22,23).<br />

The purpose of such an intermediate could be to restrain the CaM from diffusing<br />

away in the absence of the Ca 2+ signal in rapidly cycling functions such as<br />

muscle contraction and relaxation. Because the Ca 2+ affinities of CaM are<br />

strongly affected by its different target binding sequences, it has been further<br />

suggested that CaM-binding sequences in different enzymes may serve the<br />

purpose of “tuning” the calcium affinities of the Ca 2+ -binding sites so as to<br />

optimize for the formation of such intermediates when needed. Thus, in the<br />

CaM/MLCK example, we see the C-terminal domain of CaM may in fact<br />

be functioning as an “anchor” whereas CaM’s N-terminal lobe would possess<br />

the regulatory function, alternately binding and releasing the autoinhibitory<br />

sequence of MLCK in response to the Ca 2+ signal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!