13.01.2013 Views

Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols

Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols

Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols Calcium-Binding Protein Protocols

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290 Werner et al.<br />

tion, using gradient echoes, yields improved signal-to-noise ratio and good water<br />

suppression (36).<br />

3.2. Data Processing and Analysis<br />

1. All spectra recorded in one series are processed identically. Linear prediction (in<br />

the 15N dimension) and resolution enhancement (in the 1H and 15N dimensions)<br />

can be used to reduce overlap of adjacent peaks (see Note 6) (37,38). In the<br />

cbEGF32–33 pair, the data were zero-filled to obtain a digitization of less than<br />

about 4 Hz (in F2: 1H) and about 2 Hz per point (in F1: 15N). 2. The nonoverlapping peaks in the most intense [ 1H]– 15N autocorrelation spectrum<br />

are picked and assigned and the intensities of these peaks are extracted from each<br />

spectrum (see Note 7).<br />

3. Peak height uncertainties are estimated, either from the baseline noise or from<br />

the standard deviation of the difference in peak intensities of two spectra recorded<br />

with the same relaxation delay (see Note 8).<br />

4. The series of [ 1H]– 15N correlation peak intensities from the respective experiments<br />

are used to obtain the relaxation time-constants of each residue by χ2 minimization<br />

of monoexponential decay functions with initial intensity Io and decay<br />

constants T1 or T2 as free parameters<br />

I(t) = Ioe –t / T1,2 (6)<br />

Monte Carlo simulations are performed to estimate the uncertainties of the free<br />

parameters. The model is accepted if χ2 of the best fit is within a chosen (typically<br />

the ninety-fifth) percentile of the χ2 distribution of the simulated data (see<br />

Notes 7 and 9).<br />

5. In the heteronuclear NOE experiments, errors of the peak intensities in spectra<br />

with and without NOE are estimated from baseline noise for the respective spectrum.<br />

In the presence of multiple pairs of heteronuclear NOE spectra averages<br />

and standard deviations can be taken over the intensity ratios.<br />

6. The NOE ratio is calculated as the ratio of the intensities in the spectrum with<br />

saturation, Is, and without saturation, Ins, NOE = Is/Ins, and the uncertainty is<br />

obtained by error propagation:<br />

σNOE = Is / Ins √(σIs / Is) 2 + (σIns / Ins) 2 .<br />

7. The rotational correlation time of the entire molecule is obtained from the average<br />

of the T 1/T 2 ratios (28). In case substantial numbers of residues are affected<br />

by exchange or fast motion, the average over a subset of residues representative<br />

of overall diffusion is used (see also Subheading 3.3., step 2).<br />

8. A plot of the T 1 vs the T 2 value of each residue overlaid on parametric curves of<br />

T 1 and T 2 as functions of correlation time τ c and order parameter S 2 is a convenient<br />

way of obtaining a qualitative assessment of the data (see Fig. 2). Residues<br />

whose T 1 and T 2 values fall on a straight line through the origin, with slope T 1/T 2<br />

can be described by a single correlation time. Residues with T 1 and T 2 values that<br />

are shifted to the right (i.e., small T 2 values) outside the theoretical curves are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!