VUV Spectroscopy of Atoms, Molecules and Surfaces
VUV Spectroscopy of Atoms, Molecules and Surfaces
VUV Spectroscopy of Atoms, Molecules and Surfaces
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48 High-resolution <strong>VUV</strong> spectroscopy <strong>of</strong> H −<br />
tensity <strong>of</strong> ∼2×1013W/cm2 in a gas cell containing ∼7 mB Xe. This pressure<br />
corresponds to optimum phase-matching conditions for the given focusing<br />
conditions, as verified by a maximum in the generated 118 nm signal. The<br />
conversion efficiency was resonantly enhanced by the proximity <strong>of</strong> the 118 nm<br />
wavelength to the 5p–5d electronic transition in Xe [20]. The 118 nm light<br />
was separated from the 355 nm beam by an astigmatically focusing spherical<br />
grating <strong>and</strong> subsequently collimated by a curved mirror before entering<br />
the ring through a LiF window as a ∼1 cm2diameter beam. In order to<br />
obtain the maximum possible signal in the cross section measurements, the<br />
355 nm laser was operated at a pulse energy <strong>of</strong> 30–40 mJ which was on the<br />
edge <strong>of</strong> the damage threshold <strong>of</strong> the grating. In order to prevent an eventual<br />
damage implied by the presence <strong>of</strong> Xe gas, an additional LiF window could<br />
be installed in the beam path behind the laser focus to separate the grating<br />
from the Xe gas cell (not shown in the figure). Since the transmission <strong>of</strong> a<br />
LiF window, initially ∼30 %, was found to decrease as a function <strong>of</strong> exposure<br />
time to the 355 nm light, 2–3 windows were typically used during two weeks<br />
<strong>of</strong> beamtime, <strong>and</strong> for the final measurements the LiF window was removed.<br />
Although water-cooled, the grating also exhibited a decrease in efficiency as<br />
a function <strong>of</strong> time, following the eventual development <strong>of</strong> a burned spot, <strong>and</strong><br />
a new grating had to be used for each beam-time. As it turned out, the<br />
gratings bought after the successful beam-times <strong>of</strong> 1996–97 were down in efficiency<br />
by at least an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude, providing a reflectivity <strong>of</strong> at most<br />
3 %. Only very recently, just before our latest beam-time in November 2000,<br />
it was admitted to us that the coating procedure had been changed around<br />
1997. The results presented in the present chapter, recorded in May 1999,<br />
have, accordingly, been obtained with an order-<strong>of</strong>-magnitude reduction in the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> 118 nm photons per pulse compared with the 1996–97 experiments<br />
but this was compensated by an one-order-magnitude increase in the repetition<br />
rate provided by a new laser. From an absolute measurement utilizing<br />
an NO ionization cell, the amount <strong>of</strong> 118 nm flux available immediately after<br />
the grating was estimated to ∼6×109 photons/pulse as verified by an order<strong>of</strong>-magnitude<br />
reduction in the neutral-atom signal per pulse compared with<br />
the earlier experiments.<br />
The effective photon energy seen by the ions travelling with mean longitudinal<br />
velocity v is given by the Doppler formula as Eph �<br />
= γEL(1 + (v/c)cosα),<br />
where γ =1/ (1 − (v/c) 2 ), EL =10.48 eV is the photon energy in the laboratory<br />
system <strong>and</strong> α the angle <strong>of</strong> intersection, with α =0◦ corresponding to<br />
counter-propagating beams. With an ion-storage energy limited by the rigidity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the bending magnets to 160 MeV <strong>and</strong> 85 MeV, the effective photon<br />
energy can be varied up to 18.7 eV <strong>and</strong> 14.2 eV for H− <strong>and</strong> D− , respectively.<br />
The spread δE in E, equal to the energy resolution, is determined by the