14.01.2013 Views

VUV Spectroscopy of Atoms, Molecules and Surfaces

VUV Spectroscopy of Atoms, Molecules and Surfaces

VUV Spectroscopy of Atoms, Molecules and Surfaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

52 High-resolution <strong>VUV</strong> spectroscopy <strong>of</strong> H −<br />

velocity spread. As the velocity distribution narrows, the effect <strong>of</strong> intrabeam<br />

scattering, causing heating, becomes more <strong>and</strong> more pronounced, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

cooling rate decreases. Eventually an equilibrium situation is reached with<br />

equal cooling <strong>and</strong> intrabeam-scattering rates, as reflected by the slow decrease<br />

in the velocity spread <strong>and</strong> an almost constant mean velocity (2–8 s). In this<br />

regime the relative velocity spread is predicted to obey an ID 0.4 dependence<br />

(equation 161 in [21]), with ID ∝ exp(−t/τ) beingtheD − beam current <strong>and</strong><br />

τ the lifetime <strong>of</strong> the ion beam. This dependence is indicated by the solid<br />

curve in figure 3.4(b) <strong>and</strong> is seen to agree with the data. After 8 s <strong>of</strong> cooling<br />

the relative velocity spread is 7×10 −5 <strong>and</strong> thus reduced by a factor <strong>of</strong> ∼6<br />

with respect to that <strong>of</strong> an uncooled beam. The deviation from the ID 0.4 law<br />

reflects the limit <strong>of</strong> equal D − ion- <strong>and</strong> electron-beam temperatures.<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> the mean longitudinal velocity <strong>of</strong> the D − beam can be<br />

predicted from a simple one-dimensional model, disregarding magnetic fields<br />

<strong>and</strong> assuming monochromatic beams with no transverse velocity components.<br />

In the binary collision approach <strong>of</strong> Poth [21] the cooling force is then, with<br />

the present conditions, proportional to the difference between the ion- <strong>and</strong><br />

electron-beam velocities, F = K(vD(t) − ve(t)) (equation 43c in [21]). The<br />

electron-beam velocity is given by ve(t) = � 2Ve(t)/m where Ve(t) isequal<br />

to the acceleration energy <strong>of</strong> the electrons supplied by the electron- cooler<br />

cathode voltage Ucath, corrected for a small but significant contribution from<br />

space-charge. The effect <strong>of</strong> rest-gas ion trapping is taken into account through<br />

this last contribution which, as explained qualitatively above, has a large<br />

influence on the time dependence <strong>of</strong> vD(t). Denoting by ne <strong>and</strong> nrgi(t) the<br />

density <strong>of</strong> electrons <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> trapped rest-gas ions, respectively, Ve(t) isgiven<br />

on axis, i.e. in the center <strong>of</strong> the beam, by<br />

Ve(t) = eUcath + e2 r◦ 2<br />

4ɛ◦<br />

� � ��<br />

r◦<br />

(ne − nrgi(t)) −1+2ln<br />

R<br />

(3.1)<br />

where r◦ <strong>and</strong> R are the electron- <strong>and</strong> vacuum tube radii, respectively, ɛ◦<br />

the vacuum permittivity <strong>and</strong> e the elementary charge (equation 98 in [21]).<br />

Assuming nrgi(t) to approach an equilibrium value n∞ exponentially with a<br />

characteristic ”trapping” time τt, i.e. writing nrgi(t) =n∞(1 − exp(−t/τt)),<br />

the time dependence <strong>of</strong> vi can now be obtained by solving the Newtonian<br />

equation MdvD/dt = K(vD(t) − ve(t)). The result is an expression <strong>of</strong> the<br />

form<br />

vD(t) = A exp(−t/τc) − B exp(−t/τt)+C, (3.2)<br />

where τc =1/K is the cooling time <strong>and</strong> A, B, <strong>and</strong>C are positive constants.<br />

The data <strong>of</strong> figure 3.4(a) are fitted well with this expression as indicated by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!