19.01.2013 Views

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

Jurisdiction and admissibility<br />

One of the most delicate issues in the creation of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong> was the determination of its territorial and personal jurisdiction.<br />

Although there were useful models <strong>for</strong> many aspects of international justice,<br />

never be<strong>for</strong>e had the international community attempted to create a<br />

court with such general scope and application. <strong>The</strong> Nuremberg Tribunal had<br />

exercised jurisdiction ‘to try and punish persons who, acting in the interests<br />

of the European Axis countries, whether as individuals or as members<br />

of organizations’ had committed one of the crimes within the Tribunal’s<br />

subject-matter jurisdiction. 1 Thus, its jurisdiction was personal in nature;<br />

defendants had to have acted in the interests of the European Axis countries.<br />

<strong>The</strong> jurisdiction of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong> Tribunal <strong>for</strong> the Former<br />

Yugoslavia is confined to crimes committed on the territory of the <strong>for</strong>mer<br />

Yugoslavia, subsequent to 1991. 2 <strong>The</strong> jurisdiction is there<strong>for</strong>e territorial in<br />

nature. <strong>The</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong> Tribunal <strong>for</strong> Rwanda has jurisdiction<br />

over crimes committed in Rwanda during 1994, and over crimes committed<br />

by Rwandan nationals in neighbouring countries in the same period. 3<br />

Accordingly, its jurisdiction is both territorial and personal.<br />

<strong>The</strong> basic difference with these precedents is that the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong> is being created with the consent of those who will themselves<br />

be subject to its jurisdiction. <strong>The</strong>y have agreed that it is crimes committed<br />

on their territory, or by their nationals, that may be prosecuted. <strong>The</strong>se are<br />

the fundamentals of the <strong>Court</strong>’s jurisdiction. <strong>The</strong> jurisdiction that the international<br />

community has accepted <strong>for</strong> its new <strong>Court</strong> is narrower than the<br />

jurisdiction that individual States are entitled to exercise with respect to the<br />

1 Agreement <strong>for</strong> the Prosecution and Punishment of Major War <strong>Criminal</strong>s of the European Axis,<br />

and Establishing the Charter of the <strong>International</strong> Military Tribunal (IMT), <strong>An</strong>nex, (1951) 82<br />

UNTS 279, Art. 6.<br />

2 Statute of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong> Tribunal <strong>for</strong> the Former Yugoslavia, UN Doc. S/RES/827,<br />

<strong>An</strong>nex.<br />

3 Statute of the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong> Tribunal <strong>for</strong> Rwanda, UN Doc. S/RES/955, <strong>An</strong>nex.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!