19.01.2013 Views

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

An Introduction To The International Criminal Court - Institute for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140 introduction to the international criminal court<br />

logically from the nature of such a hearing. At the hearing itself, the Prosecutor<br />

is required to support each specific charge with ‘sufficient evidence<br />

to establish substantial grounds to believe that the person committed the<br />

crime charged’. 81 <strong>The</strong> Prosecutor can do this by means of documentary or<br />

summary evidence, and is not required to call the witnesses expected to testify<br />

at the trial itself. <strong>The</strong> accused may challenge the Prosecutor’s evidence<br />

and present evidence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> confirmation hearing seems to resemble preliminary hearings held<br />

under common law procedure. It allows the <strong>Court</strong> to ensure that a prosecution<br />

is not frivolous and that there is sufficient evidence <strong>for</strong> a finding<br />

of guilt, thereby protecting the accused from prosecutorial abuse. From the<br />

standpoint of the defendant, it also provides a useful opportunity to be<br />

in<strong>for</strong>med of important evidence in the possession of the prosecution and<br />

even to test the value of such evidence, at least in a superficial way, during<br />

a judicial proceeding. Where the Statute is not clear is in the usefulness of<br />

submitting defence evidence during the confirmation hearing. While the<br />

Statute invites the defence to present evidence at this stage, it is not obvious<br />

that contradictory evidence adduced by the defence can have any effect<br />

upon the determination of the existence of ‘sufficient evidence’. <strong>The</strong> Pre-<br />

Trial Chamber may well decide that whether or not defence evidence raises<br />

doubts about the validity of Prosecution evidence is a matter <strong>for</strong> the trial<br />

court and not a pre-trial issue.<br />

At the close of the confirmation hearing, the Pre-Trial Chamber may conclude<br />

that there is sufficient evidence and commit the person <strong>for</strong> trial. Upon<br />

confirmation, the Presidency of the <strong>Court</strong> is to constitute a Trial Chamber<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> subsequent proceedings. 82 <strong>The</strong> Trial Chamber is to confer<br />

with the parties and address a number of preliminary matters, including<br />

the language or languages to be used at trial. Its powers also include provision<br />

‘<strong>for</strong> disclosure of documents or in<strong>for</strong>mation not previously disclosed,<br />

sufficiently in advance of the commencement of the trial to enable adequate<br />

preparation <strong>for</strong> trial’. 83 Finally, the Trial Chamber may make orders<br />

<strong>for</strong> joinder or severance of charges against more than one accused.<br />

But the Pre-Trial Chamber may also decline to confirm the charges, a decision<br />

that does not prevent the Prosecutor from returning with a subsequent<br />

request on the basis of additional evidence. <strong>The</strong>re is also a third option:<br />

the Pre-Trial Chamber may adjourn the hearing and ask the Prosecutor to<br />

81 Rome Statute, Art. 61(5). 82 Ibid., Art. 61(11). 83 Ibid., Art. 64(3)(c).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!